agentboards.org
Compare/Adnify vs Google Antigravity

AdnifyvsGoogle Antigravity

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Adnify
adnaan · AI-native IDE
#170MCP
Panel
5.9
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
6.8
Longevity
4.7

“It detects your dev server and opens it in a protected webview tab, so the agent can admire the thing it just broke.”

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

Spec by spec

SpecAdnifyGoogle Antigravity
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThrough web search, URL reading and a built-in local app preview that detects dev servers and opens them in protected Webview tabs. YesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI.
Sandboxed executionNoYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesPlan Mode schedules isolated task threads with bounded concurrency and per-task role and model selection. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, OllamaGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120b
Bring your own modelYesYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE.
Local modelsYesYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
LicenseAdnify Software License Agreementproprietary
GitHub stars3012,446

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAdnifyGoogle AntigravityPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.57.0Google Antigravity — Pick Antigravity if you want several agents running at once with a browser checking their work; pick Cursor if you want one agent that edits well and stays out of the way.
El Crítico6.06.3Google Antigravity — Agents drive your editor, terminal and a live Chrome with no container between them and your machine; the only isolation on offer is a git worktree.
El Profesor6.86.3Adnify — Context comes from an LSP layer and a LanceDB index over the codebase, and Plan Mode terminates in an explicit result-validation step rather than a summary.
La Inversora5.37.3Google Antigravity — Google is bundling the IDE into Google AI Pro and Ultra subscriptions, distribution no startup on this board can match and a roadmap no buyer controls.
La Jefa4.55.3Google Antigravity — The Organization plan is consumption-based through Google Cloud with no seat price on the page, so the invoice for sixty developers is a forecast, not a number.
El Hacker6.34.0Adnify — Ollama sits beside the hosted providers in the model router, MCP servers attach, and the source is readable; the licence is the part I cannot fork my way out of.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.