Agent MaestrovsNezha
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Agent Maestro
Joouis · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.33 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.0
- Cost
- 8.3
- Longevity
- 5.0
“Its hosted web-search tool is executed through Exa, so your editor now subcontracts curiosity.”
Nezha
hanshuaikang · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.32 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.7
- Usefulness
- 6.0
- Cost
- 8.2
- Longevity
- 5.3
“It writes your commit messages too, so eventually nothing in the repository will be in your own words.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Agent Maestro | Nezha |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | No |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | YesAgent Maestro is a control plane; command execution and file edits happen inside the Roo Code, Cline or CLI agent it drives. | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | No | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | YesUp to twenty concurrent Roo Code tasks can run at once. | YesSeveral Claude Code and Codex sessions run at once across projects; Nezha manages them rather than coordinating them into one task. |
| Headless / CI mode | YesTasks are created and managed entirely through REST APIs, which the README calls headless AI agent control. | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, GitHub Copilot | via managed agents (Claude Code, Codex) |
| Bring your own model | Yes | NoModel choice belongs to the underlying Claude Code or Codex installation, which must be installed before Nezha is used. |
| Local models | No | No |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| GitHub stars | 206 | 1,900 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Agent Maestro | Nezha | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.8 | 6.8 | no preference |
| El Crítico | 6.0 | 6.0 | no preference |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 6.3 | Agent Maestro — Server-Sent Events for live monitoring and an OpenAPI document at /openapi.json mean the control surface is specified rather than described. |
| La Inversora | 5.5 | 6.0 | Nezha — An individual author with 1,892 stars and no company behind the project, which is interest without a business, and the roadmap depends on two vendors he does not own. |
| La Jefa | 5.0 | 5.8 | Nezha — Sixty desktop installations, each one needing the agent CLI installed first, and nothing that runs unattended, so it never becomes a step I can measure. |
| El Hacker | 7.8 | 7.0 | Agent Maestro — MIT, and it flips the arrow: Claude Code, Codex or Gemini CLI point at my editor instead of a provider, because it answers /messages and /chat/completions itself. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.