agentboards.org
Compare/AgentOS vs Sculptor

AgentOSvsSculptor

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

AgentOS
Smart Computer · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
5.5
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
4.2
Cost
7.2
Longevity
4.7

“Propose, shadow, approve, apply, execute, receipt, audit: seven gates for the agent, and none for the human who typed the prompt.”

Sculptor
Imbue · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
5.6
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.2
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
6.8
Longevity
4.7

“It ships a feature called CI Babysitter, which is the most accurate name anyone in this category has managed.”

Spec by spec

SpecAgentOSSculptor
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNoThe marketing page says every agent runs in its own container, but the help docs state the default workspace is a git worktree and describe a Docker container backend as experimental.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoNoThere is no headless mode, but a CI Babysitter watches open pull requests and dispatches an agent to fix failing checks and merge conflicts.
Models
Backbonemultiple providersClaude
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars216234

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAgentOSSculptorPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.56.3Sculptor — Pick it if you want three agents attempting a task on three branches and a pull request at the end; pick Claude Squad if you would rather that happened in a terminal.
El Crítico5.35.3no preference
El Profesor6.36.5Sculptor — It drives the wrapped agent as a streaming-JSON process with the control protocol enabled and substitutes its own ask-user and plan tools, which is interception done properly.
La Inversora5.05.3Sculptor — This is a research lab's artefact rather than a company's product: no pricing page, a preview label, and a couple of hundred stars after a year.
La Jefa5.04.8AgentOS — Zero per seat across sixty desks, a signed receipt for every action, and no console, no SSO and nothing that runs unattended.
El Hacker6.05.8AgentOS — Apache-2.0 and my own key is the good half; MCP is absent on both ends and the weights have to live on somebody else's endpoint.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.