agentboards.org
Compare/Agent Teams AI vs OpenSquilla

Agent Teams AIvsOpenSquilla

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Agent Teams AI
777genius · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.2
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.0

“The default model needs no API key at all, which is either generosity or a very strong hint about which model it is.”

OpenSquilla
TokenRhythm · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.1
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
4.5
Cost
8.2
Longevity
5.7

“Its local model router dispatches tasks to the most cost-effective model from over 20 supported LLM providers.”

Spec by spec

SpecAgent Teams AIOpenSquilla
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, windows, linux, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesNo
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsYesEach teammate can get its own git worktree, with a configurable branch strategy and diff and commit review in the app. No
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
Backbonevia managed agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Kiro), Z.AI, MiniMax, Kimi, OpenRouter
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoYes
Cost
Pricing modelfreefree
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars2,2037,076

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAgent Teams AIOpenSquillaPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.5Agent Teams AI — Pick this if you already run three agents at once and lose track of them; pick Vibe Kanban if you want the same board without a desktop install.
El Crítico6.07.0OpenSquilla — OpenSquilla's claims of token efficiency and sandbox security are undermined by its inability to edit multiple files or execute terminal commands.
El Profesor6.05.5Agent Teams AI — No benchmark is published and the documentation is thin; the one verification claim a reader can check is the hunk-level accept and reject in the review UI.
La Inversora5.36.0OpenSquilla — This is a feature play dressed up as an open-source project; the model router is clever, but the business model is a conspicuous absence.
La Jefa5.84.5Agent Teams AI — Sixty seats cost nothing in licence, and that is the last easy number: no SSO, no headless mode, and five installer formats to distribute.
El Hacker7.57.3Agent Teams AI — AGPL-3.0, a built-in MCP server package, and my own Z.AI or OpenRouter account behind whichever runtime I am driving.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.