AgentAPIvsclaude-code-router
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
AgentAPI
Coder · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
7.32 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.2
- Usefulness
- 6.7
- Cost
- 8.5
- Longevity
- 6.8
“Its web platform is a chat page served to your own laptop on port 3284, which makes it the most honest cloud on this board.”
claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.05 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.3
- Usefulness
- 7.7
- Cost
- 8.3
- Longevity
- 5.8
“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | AgentAPI | claude-code-router |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows, web | macos, linux, windows, web |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | NoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. |
| Multi-file edits | NoEditing is done by the wrapped agent; AgentAPI only relays messages to and from it. | No |
| Git operations | No | No |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | YesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | YesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. |
| Headless / CI mode | Yes | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | via wrapped agents (Claude Code, Goose, Aider, Gemini CLI, Amp, Codex) | OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, Bailian |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | No | YesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | free | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 1,500 | 37,511 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | AgentAPI | claude-code-router | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 7.5 | 7.3 | AgentAPI — Pick it when a script or a web page needs to talk to an agent you already trust in a terminal; pick the Claude Agent SDK if you only ever wrap one. |
| El Crítico | 6.5 | 6.3 | AgentAPI — It runs an in-memory terminal emulator and parses a TUI back into structured messages, so a cosmetic change upstream arrives as corrupted data downstream. |
| El Profesor | 7.0 | 7.0 | no preference |
| La Inversora | 7.3 | 6.5 | AgentAPI — Coder gives this away because an agent that speaks HTTP belongs in a remote development environment, and that is the product with the price on it. |
| La Jefa | 7.0 | 6.5 | AgentAPI — Zero licence cost and the rare tool here that fits automation without argument, but the row carries no SSO, no SCIM and no audit log. |
| El Hacker | 8.5 | 8.8 | claude-code-router — MIT, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint becomes a provider by writing its base URL into the config, which includes the server on my own machine. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.