Agentforce VibesvsAugment Code
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Agentforce Vibes
Salesforce · IDE extension
#22MCP
Panel
6.82 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.5
- Usefulness
- 6.2
- Cost
- 7.8
- Longevity
- 6.5
“An agent that writes Apex, a job nobody has ever volunteered for.”
Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.35 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.3
- Usefulness
- 7.0
- Cost
- 5.2
- Longevity
- 6.5
“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Agentforce Vibes | Augment Code |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | IDE extension | IDE extension |
| Runs | local, cloud | local, cloud |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | YesSession modes govern command execution, from "ask every time" through a configurable allowlist to bypass. | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | No | Yes |
| Browser control | No | NoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. |
| Sandboxed execution | No | YesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | No | Yes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT | Claude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, Kimi |
| Bring your own model | No | NoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. |
| Local models | No | NoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | free | mixed |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Bring your own key | No | NoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | proprietary | proprietary |
| GitHub stars | n/a | 283 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Agentforce Vibes | Augment Code | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 7.5 | 7.0 | Agentforce Vibes — Pick it if most of your week is Apex and Lightning; pick Cursor if Salesforce is only one repository among several you touch. |
| El Crítico | 6.5 | 6.0 | Agentforce Vibes — Three autonomy modes end in a bypass setting, and bypass means the command allowlist stops being consulted on a tool that executes terminal commands. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 6.5 | Agentforce Vibes — Context arrives from hosted metadata servers rather than an index, edits land through inline diff review, and the orchestration engine is named while the evaluation is not. |
| La Inversora | 7.5 | 7.0 | Agentforce Vibes — Third name in three years, from Einstein for Developers to Agentforce for Developers to this, which tells you where the marketing budget is pointed. |
| La Jefa | 8.0 | 6.8 | Agentforce Vibes — Zero incremental cost for sixty seats because it ships with the org, and an administrator enables the hosted servers in Setup, which is the control my security team wants. |
| El Hacker | 4.3 | 4.3 | no preference |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.