agentboards.org
Compare/AgenticSeek vs Looper

AgenticSeekvsLooper

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

AgenticSeek
Fosowl · Autonomous SWE
#214OSS
Panel
5.3
4 spec wins
Reliability
4.0
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
7.7
Longevity
4.3

“The wake word is whatever you named the assistant, and the docs suggest John or Emma, because speech recognition has taste.”

Looper
nexu-io · Autonomous SWE
#216OSS
Panel
5.6
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
6.2
Longevity
4.8

“It only picks up issues that are both assigned and labelled, a bar most backlogs have never once cleared.”

Spec by spec

SpecAgenticSeekLooper
Architecture
CategoryAutonomous SWEAutonomous SWE
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlYesNo
Sandboxed executionYesNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
Backboneanymultiple providers
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelfreebyok
Starts atn/a$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
GitHub stars27,417128

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAgenticSeekLooperPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.55.5no preference
El Crítico5.04.3AgenticSeek — The README calls the routing system an early prototype that may allocate the wrong agent, and the offered workaround is that you phrase every request more explicitly.
El Profesor5.86.3Looper — The forge is designated the source of truth and the planner emits a spec pull request before code, so the intermediate artefact is a reviewable document rather than hidden state.
La Inversora5.05.0no preference
La Jefa3.05.3Looper — No seat cost across sixty engineers, and it runs as a daemon on infrastructure we own, which means it needs a service account with commit rights to our repositories.
El Hacker7.87.3AgenticSeek — GPL-3.0, config.ini decides everything with is_local and provider_name, llama.cpp answers over the LAN, and there is no MCP client anywhere in it.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.