AgentrovevsRaven
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Agentrove
Mng-dev-ai · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.32 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 7.3
- Longevity
- 5.3
“There is a native iOS app, so you can now supervise a Docker container from a beach and call it a working holiday.”
Raven
EverMind AI · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.24 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.3
- Usefulness
- 6.3
- Cost
- 8.0
- Longevity
- 5.2
“It has a Sentinel that sends you proactive nudges, so the agent now has opinions about your afternoon.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Agentrove | Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local, sandbox | local, sandbox |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows, web | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | No |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | YesFiles are changed by the ACP agent running in the workspace; Agentrove supplies the editor, diffs and sandbox. | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | No |
| Browser control | No | YesDeep Research performs web search and page reading via MiroThinker and returns a cited report; there is no general browser-automation tool documented. |
| Sandboxed execution | YesEach workspace gets its own Docker sandbox, or a host sandbox if you prefer. | YesOnboarding asks for a sandbox or execution location, documented separately under docs/sandbox/usage.md. |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | YesThe agent loop spawns subagents, and tracing records parent-child subagent runs. |
| Headless / CI mode | No | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Antigravity, Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Grok, OpenCode | OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Moonshot, Groq, Azure OpenAI, GitHub Copilot (OAuth), Codex (OAuth), Ollama, vLLM |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | 330 | 5,061 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Agentrove | Raven | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.8 | 6.5 | Agentrove — Pick it if your team has settled on no single agent and wants all seven behind one door; pick the vendor's own app if you already made the choice. |
| El Crítico | 5.5 | 5.8 | Raven — The README labels the project pre-alpha and warns that interfaces and configuration may change quickly, while the skill system rewrites its own definitions between runs. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 6.3 | Agentrove — Isolation is structural rather than advisory: each workspace receives its own Docker or host sandbox, and parallel work runs in separate git worktrees instead of one shared checkout. |
| La Inversora | 5.8 | 6.0 | Raven — A named startup with 3,746 stars, no paid tier and a deliberately local product, which is a large audience attached to nothing that bills. |
| La Jefa | 5.8 | 5.0 | Agentrove — Zero licence cost and a Docker instance my platform team now operates: sixty seats are free, the on-call rota is not, and nothing here runs in a pipeline. |
| El Hacker | 7.0 | 7.8 | Raven — Apache-2.0, Ollama and vLLM among the supported providers, and tracing switched on by default but written to my own disk instead of a vendor's. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.