agentboards.org
Compare/Agno-Go vs ChatDev

Agno-GovsChatDev

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Agno-Go
rexleimo · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
5.5
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.0
Usefulness
5.0
Cost
7.8
Longevity
4.0

“It offers parity endpoints with the Python runtime, so you can rewrite everything in Go and end up with exactly what you had.”

ChatDev
OpenBMB · Agent framework
OSS
Panel
5.4
3 spec wins
Reliability
4.8
Usefulness
4.8
Cost
7.0
Longevity
4.8

“A virtual software company staffed entirely by language models, which is also the business plan of several real ones.”

Spec by spec

SpecAgno-GoChatDev
Architecture
CategoryAgent frameworkAgent framework
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoYes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, GLM, Ollama, Groq, OpenRouterany
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars6734,431

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAgno-GoChatDevPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.55.8ChatDev — Pick ChatDev to watch role-playing agents build a small program from nothing; pick OpenHands the moment the code already exists and has users.
El Crítico4.85.8ChatDev — Version 2.0 turned a research project into a zero-code console and pushed the classic line to a legacy branch, so the version every paper describes is now the old one.
El Profesor6.04.8Agno-Go — Teams carry four coordination modes and workflows five primitives, which is a closed vocabulary rather than an open-ended prompt convention, and closed vocabularies are analysable.
La Inversora4.85.5ChatDev — OpenBMB is a research organisation, and 34,000 stars of academic distribution is influence with no invoice attached anywhere in it.
La Jefa5.04.8Agno-Go — Free across sixty desks, and the health-check endpoint and session storage are the only two things in this row my platform team would recognise as operable.
El Hacker6.85.8Agno-Go — Apache-2.0, `go get`, MCP servers attach as tools, and Ollama and LM Studio are listed providers, so the whole stack runs on hardware I already paid for.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.