agentboards.org
Compare/Agor vs Raven

AgorvsRaven

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Agor
Preset · Agent harness
MCP
Panel
6.3
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.2
Longevity
5.5

“Multiplayer with live cursors, so your colleagues can now watch you argue with a robot in real time.”

Raven
EverMind AI · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.2
5 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
8.0
Longevity
5.2

“It has a Sentinel that sends you proactive nudges, so the agent now has opinions about your afternoon.”

Spec by spec

SpecAgorRaven
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocal, sandboxlocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoYesDeep Research performs web search and page reading via MiroThinker and returns a cited report; there is no general browser-automation tool documented.
Sandboxed executionYesExecution is configurable as trusted local, a fail-closed sandbox, or delegated to an external runner; Docker is one documented install path. YesOnboarding asks for a sandbox or execution location, documented separately under docs/sandbox/usage.md.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesThe agent loop spawns subagents, and tracing records parent-child subagent runs.
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
Backbonevia managed agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Cursor)OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Moonshot, Groq, Azure OpenAI, GitHub Copilot (OAuth), Codex (OAuth), Ollama, vLLM
Bring your own modelYesAgor ships no model of its own; the model comes from whichever agent CLI or SDK the session is configured to use. Yes
Local modelsNoYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseBSL-1.1Apache-2.0
GitHub stars1,4205,061

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAgorRavenPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.36.5Raven — Pick it if you want an assistant that remembers last week; pick a plain terminal agent if you would rather start every session from a clean slate.
El Crítico5.85.8no preference
El Profesor6.86.3Agor — Sessions form an explicit genealogy: forking copies context forward, spawning a subsession starts a fresh window, and the distinction is a real design decision.
La Inversora6.36.0Agor — Business Source License 1.1 from a company whose actual product is elsewhere, which makes this a strategic side project with a licence designed to stop competitors hosting it.
La Jefa6.35.0Agor — Self-hosted with role-based access scoped to branches, which is a real access-control answer, and there is no unattended execution, so it never becomes a pipeline.
El Hacker6.37.8Raven — Apache-2.0, Ollama and vLLM among the supported providers, and tracing switched on by default but written to my own disk instead of a vendor's.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.