AgorvsVerdent
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Agor
Preset · Agent harness
MCP
Panel
6.33 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 7.2
- Longevity
- 5.5
“Multiplayer with live cursors, so your colleagues can now watch you argue with a robot in real time.”
Verdent
Verdent AI · Agent harness
MCP
Panel
6.31 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.2
- Usefulness
- 7.3
- Cost
- 5.7
- Longevity
- 5.8
“Verdent Cloud builds and publishes web apps in the browser, so the thing that plans your work can now also ship it.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Agor | Verdent |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local, sandbox | local, cloud |
| Platforms | macos, linux, web | macos, windows, web |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | YesThe MCP documentation names bash alongside file_read as one of Verdent's built-in tools. |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes |
| Browser control | No | YesA verifier subagent automates web interactions and captures screenshots and logs through a browser action tool. |
| Sandboxed execution | YesExecution is configurable as trusted local, a fail-closed sandbox, or delegated to an external runner; Docker is one documented install path. | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | YesManager dispatches several worker agents at once across stages and projects, and BYOA can route those workers to Codex or Claude Code on your own machine. |
| Headless / CI mode | No | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | via managed agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Cursor) | Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GLM-5.2, Kimi K3, DeepSeek-V4-Pro |
| Bring your own model | YesAgor ships no model of its own; the model comes from whichever agent CLI or SDK the session is configured to use. | Yes |
| Local models | No | No |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | subscription |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $5/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | BSL-1.1 | proprietary |
| GitHub stars | 1,420 | n/a |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Agor | Verdent | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.3 | 6.5 | Verdent — Pick Verdent if you want to watch several agents work a board rather than babysit one chat; pick Rove if you would rather that happened in a terminal you already live in. |
| El Crítico | 5.8 | 6.0 | Verdent — The plan called Free is a seven-day trial with 100 credits, which the documentation states and the naming does not. A trial with an expiry is not a tier. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 7.0 | Verdent — A goal is decomposed into stages, subtasks, dependencies and acceptance criteria, and a verifier subagent drives a browser to capture screenshots and logs as evidence of the result. |
| La Inversora | 6.3 | 5.8 | Agor — Business Source License 1.1 from a company whose actual product is elsewhere, which makes this a strategic side project with a licence designed to stop competitors hosting it. |
| La Jefa | 6.3 | 5.5 | Agor — Self-hosted with role-based access scoped to branches, which is a real access-control answer, and there is no unattended execution, so it never becomes a pipeline. |
| El Hacker | 6.3 | 6.8 | Verdent — Closed source, and yet both escape hatches are on every plan: my own keys drive the built-in agent, and worker tasks can be handed to Codex or Claude Code on my own machine. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.