agentboards.org
Compare/AiderDesk vs CodeArts Agent

AiderDeskvsCodeArts Agent

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

AiderDesk
Hotovo · AI-native IDE
#42OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.7

“It began as a graphical front end for a terminal program and now ships a headless mode, which closes the circle nicely.”

CodeArts Agent
Huawei Cloud · AI-native IDE
#44MCP
Panel
6.8
0 spec wins
Reliability
7.0
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.8
Longevity
7.5

“There is a HarmonyOS agent and an ArkTS-tuned model, available on the China site only, which is a very specific way to be excluded.”

Spec by spec

SpecAiderDeskCodeArts Agent
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYesThe v26.5.1 release notes describe a CLI in which you run commands and a TUI in which you use natural language to complete coding tasks.
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYesGit operations are listed among the coding tasks the CLI completes, and the IDE reviews Git commit diffs.
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoDocker is documented as a way to run AiderDesk itself; task isolation is done with git worktrees, not containers. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesSub-agents are created and executed automatically for task decomposition and delegation, and multiple sessions run concurrently.
Headless / CI modeYesThrough an npm headless mode and the REST API. No
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, Groq, Mistral, Amazon Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Cerebras, OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Ollama, LM StudioGLM-5.2, openPangu-2.0-Flash, openPangu-2.0-Pro, GLM-5.2-ArkTS-SPARK
Bring your own modelYesYesThird-party models can be configured by the individual on the entry and basic tiers, and centrally by an administrator on the professional tier.
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesNo
Openness
Open sourceYesNo
LicenseApache-2.0proprietary
GitHub stars1,448n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAiderDeskCodeArts AgentPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.57.0AiderDesk — Pick it if you liked Aider but wanted to see the work; pick Aider itself if the terminal was never the part that bothered you.
El Crítico6.56.3AiderDesk — One vendor maintains subagents, agent profiles, a vector context engine, MCP in both directions, a REST API and thirty model providers, and the shell runs on your machine.
El Profesor6.57.0CodeArts Agent — Retrieval is split between a cloud index over repositories of tens of millions of lines and a local language server supplying diagnostics, jumps and symbols. Two sources, two jobs.
La Inversora5.87.5CodeArts Agent — Personal tiers run CNY 0, 98, 198 and 498 a month, and the on-demand meter is denominated in model tokens. The plugin is a funnel into the parent's inference business.
La Jefa6.37.5CodeArts Agent — Single sign-on, IP allow-lists, per-scope governance and token quotas, with a seat-based professional edition sized from 1 to 1000. This is the first row this quarter written for me.
El Hacker8.35.5AiderDesk — Apache-2.0, my keys, and a provider list that ends in Ollama and LM Studio, so the whole thing runs on the box under my desk.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.