agentboards.org
Compare/Aider vs deepx-code

Aidervsdeepx-code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Aider
Aider AI (Paul Gauthier) · Terminal agent
#7OSS
Panel
7.1
4 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.5
Longevity
7.0

“Commits every change to git so you can see exactly which one broke the build.”

deepx-code
itmisx · Terminal agent
#101OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
8.5
Longevity
6.0

“It bundles offline OCR, so the agent can read the screenshot of the error you refused to copy and paste.”

Spec by spec

SpecAiderdeepx-code
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesThe /web command and URL detection drive a real Chromium through Playwright to render and read pages (--disable-playwright turns it off); the --browser flag is only aider's own Streamlit GUI. No
Sandboxed executionNoAider publishes a Docker image as an install option only; commands it runs are not sandboxed. Yes/sandbox defaults to native OS isolation (macOS Seatbelt, Linux bubblewrap) with docker container isolation available as an alternative.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYesIndependent subtasks are split into a plan DAG and dispatched to concurrent subagents, and JS workflow scripts fan work out across agents.
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, Bedrock, Vertex AI, Azure, Groq, xAI, Ollama, LM StudioDeepSeek, Xiaomi MiMo, Kimi, Qwen, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYesAny custom OpenAI-compatible model can be configured, which covers a locally served one; no specific local runtime is named.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars49,324393

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAiderdeepx-codePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.57.3Aider — Pick Aider if you want to see every diff and steer every step; pick Claude Code if you want the agent to find the files and run on its own.
El Crítico7.36.8Aider — Every edit is a real edit on your disk with no sandbox, and auto-commit is the one mitigation standing between a bad command and your afternoon.
El Profesor8.37.0Aider — The most legible architecture on the board, with a published harness; the SWE-bench numbers are from 2024 and should be read as history, not as a claim.
La Inversora5.36.3deepx-code — 384 stars and a product shaped around the provider it optimises for: a single-vendor bet with no company behind it and no hedge if that vendor's pricing moves.
La Jefa5.57.0deepx-code — It isolates by default through macOS Seatbelt and Linux bubblewrap rather than asking the user to opt in, which is the first default on this shelf I did not have to argue for.
El Hacker9.08.0Aider — Python I can read, prompts in the repo, .aider.conf.yml for model and edit format, --model ollama/anything for an air-gapped box; MCP is the one gap.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.