agentboards.org
Compare/Aider vs Zero

AidervsZero

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Aider
Aider AI (Paul Gauthier) · Terminal agent
#7OSS
Panel
7.1
1 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
7.5
Longevity
7.0

“Commits every change to git so you can see exactly which one broke the build.”

Zero
Gitlawb · Terminal agent
#6OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.7
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
8.2
Longevity
6.2

“It accepts image input in a terminal, a sentence that would have ended a career in 2019.”

Spec by spec

SpecAiderZero
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesThe /web command and URL detection drive a real Chromium through Playwright to render and read pages (--disable-playwright turns it off); the --browser flag is only aider's own Streamlit GUI. YesBrowser and terminal control helpers ship with the npm and release builds; source builds need those helper binaries on PATH or configured in local-control settings.
Sandboxed executionNoAider publishes a Docker image as an install option only; commands it runs are not sandboxed. NoZero ships a native Linux sandbox helper using seccomp rather than Docker; source builds must build the `zero-linux-sandbox` helper separately.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes`zero exec` returns exit codes and has a documented GitHub Action recipe.
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, Bedrock, Vertex AI, Azure, Groq, xAI, Ollama, LM StudioOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Groq, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, Mistral, xAI, Qwen, Kimi, GitHub Models, Fireworks, MiniMax, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars49,3241,688

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAiderZeroPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.57.3Aider — Pick Aider if you want to see every diff and steer every step; pick Claude Code if you want the agent to find the files and run on its own.
El Crítico7.36.8Aider — Every edit is a real edit on your disk with no sandbox, and auto-commit is the one mitigation standing between a bad command and your afternoon.
El Profesor8.37.3Aider — The most legible architecture on the board, with a published harness; the SWE-bench numbers are from 2024 and should be read as history, not as a claim.
La Inversora5.35.5Zero — A permissively licensed terminal agent from a single publisher, in the most crowded category on this board, with nothing being sold at any point.
La Jefa5.56.8Zero — Nothing to license for sixty, and it is the rare tool that returns meaningful exit codes with a documented continuous integration recipe, so it can gate a build.
El Hacker9.08.5Aider — Python I can read, prompts in the repo, .aider.conf.yml for model and edit format, --model ollama/anything for an air-gapped box; MCP is the one gap.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.