agentboards.org
Compare/Amp vs Command Code

AmpvsCommand Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Amp
Amp Frontier Corporation (spun out of Sourcegraph) · Terminal agent
#111MCP
Panel
5.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
5.2
Longevity
4.8

“Twenty dollars a month buys twenty dollars of agent usage, which is at least an honest exchange rate.”

Command Code
Command Code · Terminal agent
#86MCP
Panel
5.3
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.8
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
5.8
Longevity
4.3

“The free tier gives you between ten and forty dollars of credits, a range that suggests the pricing page is also still deciding.”

Spec by spec

SpecAmpCommand Code
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesOrbs preinstall an `agent-browser` tool (https://ampcode.com/docs/orbs/customizing) and the agent "can install dependencies, run your app, spawn browsers, and test its work end to end". No
Sandboxed executionYesIsolation comes from cloud orbs, where "every orb thread gets a fresh, isolated environment" with a whole machine to itself; the local CLI has no container or OS-level sandbox. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesNon-interactive `amp -x` execute mode is documented at https://ampcode.com/docs/cli/execute-mode. Yes
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.6, Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, fast modelsClaude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.6, DeepSeek, Qwen, MiniMax, Kimi, GLM
Bring your own modelYesAmp's Model Routing settings accept your own Anthropic API key for the workspace, but you still pick an Amp mode (low/medium/high/ultra) rather than an arbitrary model, endpoint or cloud deployment. Yes
Local modelsNoNo custom base URL, LLM gateway or local endpoint is documented; all inference is routed through Amp's own service. No
Cost
Pricing modelmixedsubscription
Starts at$20/mo$1/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesYesThe docs list provider options for bringing your own account, and a $15 Provider plan sits alongside the credit plans.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAmpCommand CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.3Amp — Pick Amp if you want a sandbox without running Docker yourself; pick Claude Code or Codex CLI if you want a bigger included quota and one vendor.
El Crítico6.05.5Amp — Included usage denominated in dollars is a meter with a label on it, and a high-mode loop can spend the month in an afternoon before credits kick in.
El Profesor5.55.3Amp — Routing work across models by mode is a principled allocation of cost to difficulty, if the routing is good, and nothing published says whether it is.
La Inversora6.05.0Amp — Spun out of Sourcegraph in December 2025, wrapping two labs' frontier models with a compute sandbox as the differentiator; the acquirer list writes itself.
La Jefa5.04.8Amp — Enterprise add-ons list SSO, directory sync and minimal data retention behind a contact form, and team pricing is pay-as-you-go; no seat number to put in a memo.
El Hacker4.05.0Command Code — The npm package declares UNLICENSED and publishes no repository URL, so I get MCP servers and hackable skills inside a box I am not allowed to open.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.