agentboards.org
Compare/Amp vs Cosine

AmpvsCosine

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Amp
Amp Frontier Corporation (spun out of Sourcegraph) · Terminal agent
#111MCP
Panel
5.5
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
5.2
Longevity
4.8

“Twenty dollars a month buys twenty dollars of agent usage, which is at least an honest exchange rate.”

Cosine
Cosine AI · Terminal agent
#100MCP
Panel
5.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.2
Longevity
5.5

“It used to be called Genie and is now named after a function that always comes back around, which is a bold choice for a startup.”

Spec by spec

SpecAmpCosine
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesOrbs preinstall an `agent-browser` tool (https://ampcode.com/docs/orbs/customizing) and the agent "can install dependencies, run your app, spawn browsers, and test its work end to end". YesBrowser tools drive Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol, which requires launching the browser with --remote-debugging-port and setting cdp_url in ~/.cosine/config.toml.
Sandboxed executionYesIsolation comes from cloud orbs, where "every orb thread gets a fresh, isolated environment" with a whole machine to itself; the local CLI has no container or OS-level sandbox. YesRemote environments are isolated containers built from a Dockerfile; local runs are not sandboxed.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNon-interactive `amp -x` execute mode is documented at https://ampcode.com/docs/cli/execute-mode. No
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.6, Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, fast modelsLumen Scout, Lumen Outpost, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek, Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7, Qwen
Bring your own modelYesAmp's Model Routing settings accept your own Anthropic API key for the workspace, but you still pick an Amp mode (low/medium/high/ultra) rather than an arbitrary model, endpoint or cloud deployment. YesLimited to ChatGPT and Claude models accessed through your own provider account.
Local modelsNoNo custom base URL, LLM gateway or local endpoint is documented; all inference is routed through Amp's own service. No
Cost
Pricing modelmixedsubscription
Starts at$20/mo$19/mo
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyYesYesYou can sign in with your own ChatGPT or Claude Max subscription, which routes billing to that provider instead of consuming Cosine credits.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAmpCosinePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.3Amp — Pick Amp if you want a sandbox without running Docker yourself; pick Claude Code or Codex CLI if you want a bigger included quota and one vendor.
El Crítico6.06.0no preference
El Profesor5.55.5no preference
La Inversora6.06.0no preference
La Jefa5.05.3Cosine — Sixty engineers on the entry plan is $1,140 a month before a single credit is topped up, and there is no headless mode to put any of it in a pipeline.
El Hacker4.05.8Cosine — Closed source, but it takes my own Claude or ChatGPT subscription, and the browser tools want a cdp_url in ~/.cosine/config.toml pointing at a Chrome I launched.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.