agentboards.org
Compare/Amp vs DeepSeek-Reasonix

AmpvsDeepSeek-Reasonix

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Amp
Amp Frontier Corporation (spun out of Sourcegraph) · Terminal agent
#111MCP
Panel
5.5
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
5.2
Longevity
4.8

“Twenty dollars a month buys twenty dollars of agent usage, which is at least an honest exchange rate.”

DeepSeek-Reasonix
esengine · Terminal agent
#129OSSMCP
Panel
6.3
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.0

“Two of its top twenty contributors by commit count are bots, which is the kind of team a long-running agent deserves.”

Spec by spec

SpecAmpDeepSeek-Reasonix
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesOrbs preinstall an `agent-browser` tool (https://ampcode.com/docs/orbs/customizing) and the agent "can install dependencies, run your app, spawn browsers, and test its work end to end". No
Sandboxed executionYesIsolation comes from cloud orbs, where "every orb thread gets a fresh, isolated environment" with a whole machine to itself; the local CLI has no container or OS-level sandbox. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNon-interactive `amp -x` execute mode is documented at https://ampcode.com/docs/cli/execute-mode. Yes
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.6, Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, fast modelsDeepSeek, OpenAI-compatible endpoints
Bring your own modelYesAmp's Model Routing settings accept your own Anthropic API key for the workspace, but you still pick an Amp mode (low/medium/high/ultra) rather than an arbitrary model, endpoint or cloud deployment. Yes
Local modelsNoNo custom base URL, LLM gateway or local endpoint is documented; all inference is routed through Amp's own service. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryMIT
GitHub starsn/a35,731

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAmpDeepSeek-ReasonixPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.5Amp — Pick Amp if you want a sandbox without running Docker yourself; pick Claude Code or Codex CLI if you want a bigger included quota and one vendor.
El Crítico6.05.5Amp — Included usage denominated in dollars is a meter with a label on it, and a high-mode loop can spend the month in an afternoon before credits kick in.
El Profesor5.56.8DeepSeek-Reasonix — Context is maintained for cache stability: a fixed environment summary at startup, stale tool output pruned before compaction, and planner and executor in separate sessions; no benchmark is published.
La Inversora6.05.5Amp — Spun out of Sourcegraph in December 2025, wrapping two labs' frontier models with a compute sandbox as the differentiator; the acquirer list writes itself.
La Jefa5.05.8DeepSeek-Reasonix — Free, a single binary that drops into CI, and no SSO, SCIM or audit trail; the VS Code extension is published under an individual's marketplace ID, and support is a bilingual Discord channel.
El Hacker4.07.8DeepSeek-Reasonix — MIT, everything declared in reasonix.toml with no hardcoded models, reasonix mcp add for stdio, SSE and streamable HTTP, sidecar extensions, and make cross builds six static targets.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.