agentboards.org
Compare/Amp vs jcode

Ampvsjcode

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Amp
Amp Frontier Corporation (spun out of Sourcegraph) · Terminal agent
#111MCP
Panel
5.5
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
5.2
Longevity
4.8

“Twenty dollars a month buys twenty dollars of agent usage, which is at least an honest exchange rate.”

jcode
jcode · Terminal agent
#166OSSMCP
Panel
5.8
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.2
Usefulness
5.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
4.2

“You can spawn several AI teammates in parallel, which is how you end up holding a standup with yourself.”

Spec by spec

SpecAmpjcode
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocal, cloud, sandboxlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentedper-model, up to 1M where the model supports it
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesOrbs preinstall an `agent-browser` tool (https://ampcode.com/docs/orbs/customizing) and the agent "can install dependencies, run your app, spawn browsers, and test its work end to end". No
Sandboxed executionYesIsolation comes from cloud orbs, where "every orb thread gets a fresh, isolated environment" with a whole machine to itself; the local CLI has no container or OS-level sandbox. Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNon-interactive `amp -x` execute mode is documented at https://ampcode.com/docs/cli/execute-mode. No
Models
BackboneOpenAI GPT-5.6, Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1, fast modelsany
Bring your own modelYesAmp's Model Routing settings accept your own Anthropic API key for the workspace, but you still pick an Amp mode (low/medium/high/ultra) rather than an arbitrary model, endpoint or cloud deployment. Yes
Local modelsNoNo custom base URL, LLM gateway or local endpoint is documented; all inference is routed through Amp's own service. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mon/a
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryMIT
GitHub starsn/a38

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAmpjcodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.0Amp — Pick Amp if you want a sandbox without running Docker yourself; pick Claude Code or Codex CLI if you want a bigger included quota and one vendor.
El Crítico6.05.0Amp — Included usage denominated in dollars is a meter with a label on it, and a high-mode loop can spend the month in an afternoon before credits kick in.
El Profesor5.56.5jcode — A read-only Plan Mode produces a structured plan before any action, and the same tool implementations run locally, over SSH and inside Docker, which keeps behaviour identical across environments.
La Inversora6.05.0Amp — Spun out of Sourcegraph in December 2025, wrapping two labs' frontier models with a compute sandbox as the differentiator; the acquirer list writes itself.
La Jefa5.04.5Amp — Enterprise add-ons list SSO, directory sync and minimal data retention behind a contact form, and team pricing is pay-as-you-go; no seat number to put in a memo.
El Hacker4.08.0jcode — MIT, a single Go binary, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint including my own, and MCP servers declared in an mcp_servers block taking stdio and http entries.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.