amuxvsNetclode
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
amux
Mixpeek · Agent harness
Panel
5.83 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.2
- Usefulness
- 6.0
- Cost
- 7.5
- Longevity
- 4.3
“You can peek into a peer's terminal before interrupting it, which is more courtesy than most colleagues extend.”
Netclode
angristan · Agent harness
Panel
5.72 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.7
- Cost
- 6.3
- Longevity
- 3.8
“The workspace lives in object storage, so a paused session costs only storage, making this the rare agent that gets cheaper when ignored.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | amux | Netclode |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local | cloud, sandbox |
| Platforms | macos, linux, web | macos, linux, web |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | No |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | YesFiles are changed by the Claude Code, OpenCode, Copilot or Codex SDK running inside the microVM. |
| Git operations | No | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | Yes |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | No |
| Headless / CI mode | YesCron-style schedules and self-pacing autonomous loops run unattended; no CI integration is documented. | YesA GitHub bot spins up a sandbox on an @mention in an issue or pull request and auto-reviews Dependabot and Renovate updates. |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | via managed agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Ollama) | Claude Code SDK, OpenCode, Copilot, Codex SDK, Anthropic, OpenAI, Mistral, Ollama |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | YesOllama is listed among the agent runtimes a worker can use. | YesOllama is listed as an optional provider for running models on your own GPU. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | MIT with Commons Clause | unspecified |
| GitHub stars | 513 | 257 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | amux | Netclode | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.3 | 6.0 | amux — Pick amux if you want a fleet of agents working overnight with a board to wake up to; pick Crystal if you would rather supervise a couple of them yourself. |
| El Crítico | 5.5 | 5.3 | amux — The watchdog restarts crashed sessions and replays the last message, so a failing agent is resurrected rather than reported and the failure never surfaces. |
| El Profesor | 6.3 | 6.5 | Netclode — A warm pool of pre-booted microVMs answers the latency objection to strong isolation, and an event log lets a client reconnect without losing state. |
| La Inversora | 5.0 | 5.0 | no preference |
| La Jefa | 5.0 | 5.3 | Netclode — Per-repository scoped tokens from a forge app, and a proxy that keeps provider keys out of the sandbox: two controls I usually have to ask for. |
| El Hacker | 6.5 | 6.0 | amux — One Rust binary with a SQLite store, model or provider swappable mid-run without losing context, and Ollama listed among the worker runtimes. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.