agentboards.org
Compare/Anda vs eve

Andavseve

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Anda
LDC Labs · Agent framework
OSSMCP
Panel
5.8
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
5.0
Cost
8.2
Longevity
4.7

“Its model tiers are named primary, pro, flash and lite, so your architecture now inherits somebody else's marketing department.”

eve
Vercel · Agent framework
OSS
Panel
5.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.2
Usefulness
4.8
Cost
7.0
Longevity
6.0

“An agent whose entire configuration is a directory, from a company whose entire product is a directory.”

Spec by spec

SpecAndaeve
Architecture
CategoryAgent frameworkAgent framework
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesShell execution and filesystem access are optional engine extensions rather than always-on tools. No
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesAgents can call other agents through the same registration traits, and the runner accounts for nested agent calls. No
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
Backboneprovider-specific adapters behind a common contractany AI Gateway model
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars4425,443

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAndaevePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.56.0eve — Pick it if you want an assistant that lives in a repository and answers in Slack; pick Mastra when you need a framework that will actually reach into your codebase.
El Crítico5.54.8Anda — The published surface covers routing, scoped contexts, a completion runner, memory and eight optional extensions, carried by a project with 438 stars.
El Profesor7.36.0Anda — Servers expose capability groups that an agent expands only when it needs the schemas, which is a genuine answer to tool-description bloat in the context window.
La Inversora5.06.0eve — 4,971 stars in three months from a company whose inference routing service supplies the model identifiers, which makes the open framework a very well-built funnel.
La Jefa4.85.5eve — Nothing to buy for sixty engineers, and the spend arrives metered through a routing service, while messaging channels and schedules make this an internal bot platform.
El Hacker6.86.3Anda — Apache-2.0, a cargo install, signed outbound calls and per-agent isolated state, though the row records no local inference, so the weights are still remote.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.