agentboards.org
Compare/Google Antigravity vs Async IDE

Google AntigravityvsAsync IDE

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

Async IDE
ZYKJShadow · AI-native IDE
#37OSSMCP
Panel
6.4
2 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.2
Longevity
5.3

“It bridges to Telegram, Slack, Discord and Feishu, so four separate apps can now tell you the build is broken.”

Spec by spec

SpecGoogle AntigravityAsync IDE
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI. YesBrowser automation with custom headers and fingerprint is one of the built-in tools.
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesAgent and Team toolchains are shared with the IM bot bridge, each with its own model, workspace and allowlist config.
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120bAnthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, vLLM, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint
Bring your own modelYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE. Yes
Local modelsYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryApache-2.0
GitHub stars2,446474

Which one would each critic pick

CriticGoogle AntigravityAsync IDEPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.8Google Antigravity — Pick Antigravity if you want several agents running at once with a browser checking their work; pick Cursor if you want one agent that edits well and stays out of the way.
El Crítico6.36.0Google Antigravity — Agents drive your editor, terminal and a live Chrome with no container between them and your machine; the only isolation on offer is a git worktree.
El Profesor6.37.0Async IDE — The control loop is named and exposed: Think, Plan, Execute, Observe, with each stage visible and interruptible rather than collapsed into one opaque completion.
La Inversora7.35.8Google Antigravity — Google is bundling the IDE into Google AI Pro and Ultra subscriptions, distribution no startup on this board can match and a roadmap no buyer controls.
La Jefa5.35.3no preference
El Hacker4.07.8Async IDE — Apache-2.0, Ollama and vLLM named directly rather than implied, MCP servers attach, and each agent carries its own model, workspace and allowlist.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.