agentboards.org
Compare/Google Antigravity vs Kiro

Google AntigravityvsKiro

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

Kiro
Amazon Web Services · AI-native IDE
#57MCP
Panel
6.5
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
5.7
Longevity
7.3

“Makes you write requirements, design and tasks before any code, so the credit meter starts running before the first line does.”

Spec by spec

SpecGoogle AntigravityKiro
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI. YesEvery Kiro Web sandbox ships a headless Chrome with Playwright MCP, the agent-browser CLI and the Chrome DevTools MCP server preinstalled; the local IDE and CLI have no built-in browser tool.
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles. YesKiro Web runs each task in its own isolated execution environment with configurable access controls.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120bClaude, GPT, DeepSeek, Qwen, MiniMax, GLM
Bring your own modelYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE. NoKiro exposes a picker over its own curated model list plus an Auto router; no custom base URL, Bedrock deployment or self-hosted endpoint is documented.
Local modelsYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented. NoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; only Kiro-hosted models are selectable.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesNoKIRO_API_KEY for headless runs is a Kiro platform token billed against Kiro credits, not your own provider or AWS account key.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars2,4464,343

Which one would each critic pick

CriticGoogle AntigravityKiroPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.3Kiro — Pick Kiro if you want an agent that makes you write requirements and a design before it touches code, and accept that the bill is a credit meter you cannot route around with your own key.
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor6.36.5Kiro — Kiro's spec-first pipeline is a principled ordering, requirements before design before tasks before code, but no benchmark and no published evaluation accompanies it.
La Inversora7.37.8Kiro — Kiro is AWS's entry, and the question is never whether AWS can fund it, only whether AWS keeps caring.
La Jefa5.37.0Kiro — SSO and centralized billing exist, steering files make rules enforceable, and the meter has an admin-controlled overage switch; approved with conditions.
El Hacker4.04.3Kiro — Closed source, no key of my own, no local models, and a credit meter; the hooks and steering files are good enough that I resent how little else I can touch.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.