agentboards.org
Compare/Google Antigravity vs Kun

Google AntigravityvsKun

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

Kun
KunAgent · AI-native IDE
#84MCP
Panel
5.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
6.5
Longevity
4.8

“It writes your code and also your slide deck, which is the most accurate description of an engineering week ever shipped as a feature list.”

Spec by spec

SpecGoogle AntigravityKun
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI. YesBrowser output is attached to tasks and screenshots are captured through browser automation.
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120bOpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Ollama, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, Qwen, MiniMax
Bring your own modelYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE. Yes
Local modelsYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented. YesOllama ships as a named provider preset, and base URLs are editable so any OpenAI-compatible or Anthropic-compatible endpoint can be added.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
LicenseproprietaryPolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0
GitHub stars2,4466,324

Which one would each critic pick

CriticGoogle AntigravityKunPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.3Google Antigravity — Pick Antigravity if you want several agents running at once with a browser checking their work; pick Cursor if you want one agent that edits well and stays out of the way.
El Crítico6.35.8Google Antigravity — Agents drive your editor, terminal and a live Chrome with no container between them and your machine; the only isolation on offer is a git worktree.
El Profesor6.36.5Kun — The graphical client and the terminal client both attach to one local runtime, so threads, plans and approvals are shared state rather than two synchronised copies.
La Inversora7.35.0Google Antigravity — Google is bundling the IDE into Google AI Pro and Ultra subscriptions, distribution no startup on this board can match and a roadmap no buyer controls.
La Jefa5.34.8Google Antigravity — The Organization plan is consumption-based through Google Cloud with no seat price on the page, so the invoice for sixty developers is a forecast, not a number.
El Hacker4.06.5Kun — PolyForm Noncommercial, so I can read it and never ship a competing fork, but Ollama is a named preset and every base URL is editable.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.