agentboards.org
Compare/Google Antigravity vs Qoder

Google AntigravityvsQoder

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

Qoder
Alibaba · AI-native IDE
#36MCP
Panel
6.5
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
6.0
Longevity
7.0

“There is a mobile app for approving agent work, so you can now merge a refactor you cannot read on a screen you cannot see.”

Spec by spec

SpecGoogle AntigravityQoder
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI. No
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesExperts mode dispatches multiple expert agents in parallel, and subagents can be supplied by installed extensions.
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120bQwen, GLM, Kimi
Bring your own modelYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE. Yes
Local modelsYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented. No
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYesBring Your Own Key is listed as a Free plan feature.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars2,446n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticGoogle AntigravityQoderPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.8Google Antigravity — Pick Antigravity if you want several agents running at once with a browser checking their work; pick Cursor if you want one agent that edits well and stays out of the way.
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor6.36.8Qoder — Repo Wiki precomputes a structured description of the repository and serves it as context, which is a materialised index rather than retrieval at query time.
La Inversora7.37.8Qoder — The Chinese edition is the renamed Tongyi Lingma with 2.6 million marketplace installs, so this launched with distribution most vendors here spend three years buying.
La Jefa5.36.3Qoder — Sixty developers is $1,200 monthly at the entry tier and $12,000 at the top, everything is metered in Credits, and team pricing is quoted rather than published.
El Hacker4.05.5Qoder — Closed source and no inference on my hardware, but bring-your-own-key is listed on the free plan and MCP servers attach, which is more rope than most vendors offer.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.