agentboards.org
Compare/Google Antigravity vs Trae

Google AntigravityvsTrae

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Google Antigravity
Google · AI-native IDE
#68MCP
Panel
6.0
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.2
Longevity
5.8

“Google's own IDE ships Claude and gpt-oss next to Gemini, the most honest model review Google has ever published.”

Trae
ByteDance · AI-native IDE
#79MCP
Panel
5.9
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.3
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
6.5
Longevity
5.5

“The $3 Lite plan is the cheapest seat on this board, courtesy of a parent company that never needed you to pay for anything.”

Spec by spec

SpecGoogle AntigravityTrae
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesA first-party browser subagent drives Chrome from a separate profile with allowlist/denylist controls (https://antigravity.google/docs/ide/browser/); IDE-side only, not in the agy CLI. YesAI can drive TraeCode's built-in browser tab - opening pages, clicking, filling forms and validating rendering - or an external Chrome instance, once enabled under Settings > Browser (https://docs.trae.ai/ide/browser-use). The built-in Chat agent cannot control the browser.
Sandboxed executionYesOS-level isolation rather than containers: "no virtual machines or Docker images to manage" - Linux uses kernel namespaces to isolate the filesystem, hide host processes and cut networking; macOS uses sandbox-exec with Seatbelt (SBPL) profiles. YesAgent commands run in a restricted, isolated environment with per-project filesystem and network policy in ~/.trae/sandbox.json; Linux isolation is implemented via bubblewrap, and allowlisted command prefixes deliberately bypass the sandbox.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNoConfirmed false: Trae ships only the desktop IDE; no CLI, print/exec mode or CI runner appears anywhere in the documentation index.
Models
BackboneGemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120bGemini, GPT, DeepSeek
Bring your own modelYesSetting `modelProvider: "gemini"` in ~/.gemini/antigravity-cli/settings.json plus a GEMINI_API_KEY runs the CLI on your own key and billing instead of a signed-in Google account, and a model selector picks between Gemini, Claude and gpt-oss models in the IDE. Yes
Local modelsYesGOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL sends model requests to any Gemini-compatible endpoint, so a self-hosted shim works as a mechanism; no Ollama or LM Studio integration is documented. YesThe custom-model flow accepts an arbitrary API format, request URL and key, so any self-hosted OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint works alongside the preset providers.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$3/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars2,446n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticGoogle AntigravityTraePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.8Google Antigravity — Pick Antigravity if you want several agents running at once with a browser checking their work; pick Cursor if you want one agent that edits well and stays out of the way.
El Crítico6.35.8Google Antigravity — Agents drive your editor, terminal and a live Chrome with no container between them and your machine; the only isolation on offer is a git worktree.
El Profesor6.35.5Google Antigravity — No benchmark is published; the design bet is verification by artifact, with plans, walkthroughs and screenshots the human reviews instead of raw tool logs.
La Inversora7.35.8Google Antigravity — Google is bundling the IDE into Google AI Pro and Ultra subscriptions, distribution no startup on this board can match and a roadmap no buyer controls.
La Jefa5.35.5Trae — Enterprise means contacting BytePlus, the pricing page lists no SSO or audit log, and the security questionnaire's first question is where the prompts go; not yet.
El Hacker4.06.0Trae — Closed source, but any compatible endpoint with my own key, local models, an mcpServers config and subagents; more knobs than I expected from a ByteDance IDE.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.