agentboards.org
Compare/Arkain vs Bolt

ArkainvsBolt

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Arkain
goorm · Web app builder
#193MCP
Panel
4.8
2 spec wins
Reliability
4.8
Usefulness
5.2
Cost
4.2
Longevity
5.2

“Its prompt-to-app builder is free for three uses, which is roughly how many attempts it takes to describe what you wanted.”

Bolt
StackBlitz · Web app builder
#159MCP
Panel
4.9
1 spec wins
Reliability
4.5
Usefulness
5.3
Cost
4.3
Longevity
5.5

“Open source until December 2024, metered ever since, and the meter mostly counts uploading your own files to the model.”

Spec by spec

SpecArkainBolt
Architecture
CategoryWeb app builderWeb app builder
Runscloudsandbox, cloud
Platformswebweb
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoRepositories are imported from GitHub, but the docs do not describe the agent committing or opening pull requests. Yes
Browser controlYesArkain itself runs in the browser and the agent has a web fetch tool; it does not document driving a browser as a tool. NoNo browser-driving or app-testing agent is documented; Standard and Max differ only in how much the agent reasons per step (https://support.bolt.new/building/using-bolt/agents.md).
Sandboxed executionYesEvery project runs in its own Linux container in Arkain's cloud, sized by the plan. Yes"Bolt relies on WebContainers, a browser-based runtime from StackBlitz that enables a full-stack development environment in the browser" — an in-browser VM, not a container you manage.
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneClaude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.4, GPT-5 mini, Gemini 3 ProClaude
Bring your own modelNoNo"Bolt handles model selection behind the scenes" — no model or provider picker, custom endpoint or key.
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedsubscription
Starts at$0/mo$25/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyNoNo
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/a16,569

Which one would each critic pick

CriticArkainBoltPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.85.5Arkain — Pick this if you want a working environment without installing one; pick a local terminal agent if you would rather own the machine your code is edited on.
El Crítico4.84.8no preference
El Profesor5.04.8Arkain — The agent is documented as independently exploring the codebase, but the retrieval method behind that verb is not described, and no evaluation accompanies the claim.
La Inversora5.86.0Bolt — StackBlitz pivoted from an IDE to an app builder, open-sourced a core it stopped updating, and now competes on features in the most crowded category on this board.
La Jefa4.55.0Bolt — JavaScript only, no headless mode, enterprise on request, and a meter that grows with repository size; a demo tool for the design team, not yet for engineering.
El Hacker3.33.5Bolt — The MIT repo stopped in December 2024, the hosted product is closed, Claude only, no key of my own; WebContainers are clever and I still cannot own any of it.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.