Async IDEvsCursor
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Async IDE
ZYKJShadow · AI-native IDE
#37OSSMCP
Panel
6.43 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.7
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 8.2
- Longevity
- 5.3
“It bridges to Telegram, Slack, Discord and Feishu, so four separate apps can now tell you the build is broken.”
Cursor
Anysphere · AI-native IDE
#12MCP
Panel
6.82 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.0
- Usefulness
- 7.7
- Cost
- 5.5
- Longevity
- 6.8
“Twenty dollars a month, then 3x, then 20x, and the page never says 20x of what.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Async IDE | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | AI-native IDE | AI-native IDE |
| Runs | local | local, cloud |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | 200k default, up to 1M tokens on select models |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes |
| Browser control | YesBrowser automation with custom headers and fingerprint is one of the built-in tools. | Yes |
| Sandboxed execution | No | Yes |
| Multi-agent orchestration | YesAgent and Team toolchains are shared with the IM bot bridge, each with its own model, workspace and allowlist config. | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | No | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, vLLM, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint | Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Composer, Kimi, GLM |
| Bring your own model | Yes | YesYour own keys reach the vendors' own models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) plus your own Azure OpenAI deployment or AWS Bedrock account; Tab completion always stays on Cursor's models. |
| Local models | Yes | NoCustom API keys are limited to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure OpenAI and AWS Bedrock, with no documented base URL override, so Ollama, LM Studio or a self-hosted endpoint cannot be pointed at. |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | mixed |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | proprietary |
| GitHub stars | 474 | n/a |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Async IDE | Cursor | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.8 | 7.8 | Cursor — The best editor experience today, with a subscription that turns into a meter the moment you push the agent hard. |
| El Crítico | 6.0 | 6.5 | Cursor — The sandbox is a property of the run mode you pick, and Run Everything drops it, while the pricing page turns limits into a ladder of tiers to climb. |
| El Profesor | 7.0 | 6.0 | Async IDE — The control loop is named and exposed: Think, Plan, Execute, Observe, with each stage visible and interruptible rather than collapsed into one opaque completion. |
| La Inversora | 5.8 | 8.3 | Cursor — Real revenue, real pricing power, an in-house model, and a dependency on the labs it competes with for every frontier request. |
| La Jefa | 5.3 | 7.5 | Cursor — Teams at $40 per user with SSO, but SCIM, audit logs and auto-run controls sit behind a custom Enterprise quote. |
| El Hacker | 7.8 | 4.5 | Async IDE — Apache-2.0, Ollama and vLLM named directly rather than implied, MCP servers attach, and each agent carries its own model, workspace and allowlist. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.