agentboards.org
Compare/Async IDE vs CodeArts Agent

Async IDEvsCodeArts Agent

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Async IDE
ZYKJShadow · AI-native IDE
#37OSSMCP
Panel
6.4
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.2
Longevity
5.3

“It bridges to Telegram, Slack, Discord and Feishu, so four separate apps can now tell you the build is broken.”

CodeArts Agent
Huawei Cloud · AI-native IDE
#44MCP
Panel
6.8
1 spec wins
Reliability
7.0
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.8
Longevity
7.5

“There is a HarmonyOS agent and an ArkTS-tuned model, available on the China site only, which is a very specific way to be excluded.”

Spec by spec

SpecAsync IDECodeArts Agent
Architecture
CategoryAI-native IDEAI-native IDE
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYesThe v26.5.1 release notes describe a CLI in which you run commands and a TUI in which you use natural language to complete coding tasks.
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYesGit operations are listed among the coding tasks the CLI completes, and the IDE reviews Git commit diffs.
Browser controlYesBrowser automation with custom headers and fingerprint is one of the built-in tools. No
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesAgent and Team toolchains are shared with the IM bot bridge, each with its own model, workspace and allowlist config. YesSub-agents are created and executed automatically for task decomposition and delegation, and multiple sessions run concurrently.
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneAnthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, vLLM, any OpenAI-compatible endpointGLM-5.2, openPangu-2.0-Flash, openPangu-2.0-Pro, GLM-5.2-ArkTS-SPARK
Bring your own modelYesYesThird-party models can be configured by the individual on the entry and basic tiers, and centrally by an administrator on the professional tier.
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesNo
Openness
Open sourceYesNo
LicenseApache-2.0proprietary
GitHub stars474n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAsync IDECodeArts AgentPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.87.0CodeArts Agent — Pick this if your company already runs on Huawei Cloud and you want the same agent in four places; pick a self-serve terminal agent if you do not want an account first.
El Crítico6.06.3CodeArts Agent — Sub-agents are created and scheduled automatically for decomposition, so the operator never chooses the split, and concurrent sessions multiply whatever that automatic choice got wrong.
El Profesor7.07.0no preference
La Inversora5.87.5CodeArts Agent — Personal tiers run CNY 0, 98, 198 and 498 a month, and the on-demand meter is denominated in model tokens. The plugin is a funnel into the parent's inference business.
La Jefa5.37.5CodeArts Agent — Single sign-on, IP allow-lists, per-scope governance and token quotas, with a seat-based professional edition sized from 1 to 1000. This is the first row this quarter written for me.
El Hacker7.85.5Async IDE — Apache-2.0, Ollama and vLLM named directly rather than implied, MCP servers attach, and each agent carries its own model, workspace and allowlist.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.