agentboards.org
Compare/AtomCode vs CoreCoder

AtomCodevsCoreCoder

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

AtomCode
AtomGit · Terminal agent
#194OSS
Panel
5.9
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
5.2
Cost
7.7
Longevity
5.0

“The project states that every line of its code was written by AI, which is either a credential or a warning.”

CoreCoder
He Yufeng · Terminal agent
#215OSS
Panel
5.9
4 spec wins
Reliability
5.5
Usefulness
5.2
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.0

“It ships eight essays explaining its own source code, which is eight more than most agents ship.”

Spec by spec

SpecAtomCodeCoreCoder
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes`corecoder -p` runs a single prompt non-interactively, but the tool guard is a regex blacklist, not a security sandbox.
Models
BackboneOpenAI-compatibleany OpenAI-compatible endpoint, Ollama, LiteLLM
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoYesDocumented with a local Ollama endpoint via OPENAI_BASE_URL, and an optional LiteLLM backend for other providers.
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars2021,788

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAtomCodeCoreCoderPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.56.0AtomCode — Pick AtomCode if you want a small terminal agent that will scout before it touches anything; pick Aider if you want the same discipline with a much larger community behind it.
El Crítico5.35.5CoreCoder — The tool guard is a pattern blacklist rather than isolation, and the same tool ships a non-interactive mode that runs a prompt with nobody watching.
El Profesor6.57.0CoreCoder — 1,217 lines cover the loop, model interface, context, tools and sessions, with three-tier compaction and a per-run token and cost report; the protocol layer is deliberately absent.
La Inversora5.54.3AtomCode — Carried under the AtomGit banner with 191 stars, no company, no meter and no hosted tier. Platform-sponsored open source, which survives exactly as long as the platform's interest does.
La Jefa4.84.3AtomCode — Free across sixty seats and unbuyable anyway: no install command is published, macOS and Linux only, so a third of my desks are excluded before procurement opens the file.
El Hacker6.88.3CoreCoder — MIT, one pip command, and a base URL environment variable pointed at my own server, with an optional router underneath for everything else.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.