agentboards.org
Compare/Atomic Agent vs Forall

Atomic AgentvsForall

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Atomic Agent
AtomicBot · Terminal agent
#187OSSMCP
Panel
6.0
5 spec wins
Reliability
5.2
Usefulness
6.0
Cost
8.7
Longevity
4.3

“It keeps a browser profile as a local file, so your agent now has browsing history and you can read it.”

Forall
Astrio Labs · Terminal agent
#198OSSMCP
Panel
6.0
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.0

“The install script requires that a release binary already exists, a prerequisite the README states in complete earnest.”

Spec by spec

SpecAtomic AgentForall
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlYesNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoNo
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
Backbonellama.cpp, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, Anthropic, OpenAIOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Claude via Amazon Bedrock
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokmixed
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesNo
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars2,564577

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAtomic AgentForallPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.36.3no preference
El Crítico5.55.8Forall — It writes the specification and then grades the code against it, so the strongest rung certifies agreement between two artefacts the same tool produced in the same session.
El Profesor5.57.0Forall — The four rungs, spec tracked through property tested and contracted to proved, grade each requirement by the strongest evidence actually produced rather than by intent.
La Inversora5.56.0Forall — 597 stars, no price published anywhere, and hosted models tied to a plan: the repository is the funnel and the account is the product, which is a familiar shape.
La Jefa5.55.0Atomic Agent — Nothing per seat and nothing leaves the workstation, which is the shortest data review I will run, and there is no console over sixty of them.
El Hacker8.06.3Atomic Agent — MIT, a llama.cpp build underneath, MCP servers wired in, and it embeds over HTTP or as a Tauri sidecar, so it becomes a component in things I build.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.