agentboards.org
Compare/Auggie CLI vs Cosine

Auggie CLIvsCosine

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Auggie CLI
Augment Code · Terminal agent
#43MCP
Panel
6.0
2 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.3
Longevity
5.5

“Windows support means Windows Subsystem for Linux, which is a polite way of saying Linux.”

Cosine
Cosine AI · Terminal agent
#100MCP
Panel
5.8
5 spec wins
Reliability
5.7
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.2
Longevity
5.5

“It used to be called Genie and is now named after a function that always comes back around, which is a bold choice for a startup.”

Spec by spec

SpecAuggie CLICosine
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesAuggie analyses staged changes and diffs and supports a GitHub API token for repository operations. Yes
Browser controlNoWeb search and web fetch tools are documented, but there is no browser automation. YesBrowser tools drive Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol, which requires launching the browser with --remote-debugging-port and setting cdp_url in ~/.cosine/config.toml.
Sandboxed executionNoYesRemote environments are isolated containers built from a Dockerfile; local runs are not sandboxed.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneClaude, Gemini, GPT-5, GLM, KimiLumen Scout, Lumen Outpost, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek, Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7, Qwen
Bring your own modelNoYesLimited to ChatGPT and Claude models accessed through your own provider account.
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelsubscriptionsubscription
Starts at$20/mo$19/mo
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyNoYesYou can sign in with your own ChatGPT or Claude Max subscription, which routes billing to that provider instead of consuming Cosine credits.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAuggie CLICosinePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.86.3Auggie CLI — Pick it if your company already runs Augment in the editor and you want that context in a terminal; pick Claude Code if you are choosing from scratch.
El Crítico5.86.0Cosine — The same agent has two different safety models: remote environments are isolated containers, and local runs are not isolated at all.
El Profesor6.05.5Auggie CLI — The context engine is the product's central claim and no measurement of it is published; capability here is documented, not demonstrated.
La Inversora6.86.0Auggie CLI — A flat team price with usage credits attached and a forty per cent service fee on inference is a margin structure, not a discount.
La Jefa6.35.3Auggie CLI — Both published tiers stop at fifty seats, so sixty engineers means Enterprise, which means contact sales before I know a number.
El Hacker4.35.8Cosine — Closed source, but it takes my own Claude or ChatGPT subscription, and the browser tools want a cdp_url in ~/.cosine/config.toml pointing at a Chrome I launched.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.