agentboards.org
Compare/Augment Code vs avante.nvim

Augment Codevsavante.nvim

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.3
6 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.5

“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”

avante.nvim
avante-corp · IDE extension
#23OSS
Panel
7.0
7 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.0
Longevity
7.0

“It has a mode that makes Neovim look like a coding-agent CLI, completing a circle nobody asked to close.”

Spec by spec

SpecAugment Codeavante.nvim
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYesThrough the ACP integration with agent CLIs such as Claude Code, Codex and Gemini CLI.
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. No
Sandboxed executionYesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. No
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, Kimiany
Bring your own modelNoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. Yes
Local modelsNoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. YesOllama and llama-cpp are listed among the supported providers.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryApache-2.0
GitHub stars28318,174

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAugment Codeavante.nvimPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.5avante.nvim — Pick it if you want Cursor's working style without leaving Neovim; pick CodeCompanion.nvim if you would rather have chat buffers and a workflow engine.
El Crítico6.06.8avante.nvim — It emulates a commercial IDE's interaction model, which makes its design a moving target set by a competitor, and installation needs a native build step.
El Profesor6.56.8avante.nvim — Retrieval is an optional local index, edits apply in a single action, and execution is delegated over the Agent Client Protocol rather than reimplemented.
La Inversora7.06.3Augment Code — Publishing a 40 percent service fee is either transparency or a confession, and exposing the index over MCP is a hedge toward becoming a component in other people's agents.
La Jefa6.85.8Augment Code — SOC 2 Type II, CMEK, audit trails and training exclusion on every plan, pooled usage to 50 seats, SSO and SCIM at Enterprise; approved with a spend ceiling.
El Hacker4.38.8avante.nvim — Apache-2.0, and the provider list runs to Ollama and llama.cpp, so the whole loop runs on my hardware with no key, no account and no telemetry.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.