agentboards.org
Compare/Augment Code vs GitHub Copilot

Augment CodevsGitHub Copilot

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.3
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.5

“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”

GitHub Copilot
GitHub (Microsoft) · IDE extension
#4MCP
Panel
7.0
7 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
7.0
Longevity
7.5

“Ten dollars a month includes fifteen dollars of credits, and the agent is how you find out what a credit is.”

Spec by spec

SpecAugment CodeGitHub Copilot
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows, web
Context windownot documentedUp to 1M tokens on select models in Copilot CLI
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlNoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. YesThe Playwright MCP server is enabled by default for the cloud agent and code review, so it drives a real browser rather than only searching the web.
Sandboxed executionYesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. YesThe Copilot cloud agent gets its own ephemeral development environment powered by GitHub Actions; the IDE agent mode and Copilot CLI run unsandboxed on your machine.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. Yes
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, KimiOpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Microsoft MAI, xAI Grok, Moonshot Kimi
Bring your own modelNoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. Yes
Local modelsNoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$10/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars28311,237

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAugment CodeGitHub CopilotPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.8GitHub Copilot — Not the strongest agent here and the easiest to start with; if your code already lives on GitHub, begin here and add a stronger tool where it falls short.
El Crítico6.06.5GitHub Copilot — The isolation is real but remote: the sandboxed cloud agent is the part you pay premium requests for, while local agent mode runs on your machine outside it.
El Profesor6.55.8Augment Code — Two benchmark claims, one an ensemble and one a controlled comparison on the vendor's own harness; neither should be read against the public leaderboards.
La Inversora7.09.3GitHub Copilot — Incumbency is the moat: inside the editor, inside the repository host, on invoices approved years ago, with Microsoft's balance sheet behind it.
La Jefa6.88.0GitHub Copilot — Already on the invoice, with the IP indemnity and policy controls legal asked for on Business and Enterprise; the premium-request meter needs an org-level cap.
El Hacker4.34.8GitHub Copilot — Closed source, but the CLI takes my own key and a local model, and MCP uses the standard servers JSON block; more than I expected, less than I want.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.