agentboards.org
Compare/Augment Code vs Junie

Augment CodevsJunie

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.3
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.5

“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”

Junie
JetBrains · IDE extension
#56MCP
Panel
7.0
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
6.7
Cost
6.5
Longevity
7.8

“Runs on your own Ollama from the CLI, but the plugin still wants a JetBrains AI credit, of which the free plan gives you three.”

Spec by spec

SpecAugment CodeJunie
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal, cloud
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. NoNo built-in browser or Playwright tool in either the CLI or the IDE plugin; web automation only arrives through a user-added MCP server.
Sandboxed executionYesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. NoParallel sessions are isolated with Git worktrees, not containers or OS-level sandboxing.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. Yes`junie --auth="$JUNIE_API_KEY" "<prompt>"` runs one-shot in CI, with documented GitHub Action and GitLab CI/CD integrations.
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, KimiClaude, GPT, Gemini, Grok
Bring your own modelNoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. YesJunie CLI takes JSON model profiles pointing at any OpenAI-, Anthropic- or Gemini-compatible base URL, including enterprise proxies and LiteLLM gateways.
Local modelsNoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. YesDocumented setups for Ollama, LM Studio and LiteLLM through the same custom-endpoint profiles.
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mo$10/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. YesYour own OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, OpenRouter or GitHub Copilot key, via /account in the CLI.
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars283n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAugment CodeJuniePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.0no preference
El Crítico6.06.3Junie — Junie's credit table prices chat generations but not agent runs, its Brave mode removes confirmations with no sandbox behind it, and its headline benchmark is a rolling set with a pass@5 attached.
El Profesor6.57.0Junie — Junie's SWE-rebench first place is a rolling-set result that moves run to run by the organizer's own account, and its debugger integration is a verification channel most agents on this board lack.
La Inversora7.08.0Junie — JetBrains sells IDE renewals, and Junie is a retention feature priced through AI plans, which means the agent does not need to win, it needs to be good enough that nobody leaves.
La Jefa6.87.5Junie — Pooled credits through JetBrains Central, admin-set spending limits, and an Enterprise AI plan at $60 a user on IDE licenses we already hold; approved with conditions until the burn rate is measured.
El Hacker4.36.0Junie — The CLI takes my own keys, OpenRouter, Ollama or LM Studio, and an mcpServers block; the plugin is closed and wants a JetBrains AI credit, of which the free plan gives three.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.