agentboards.org
Compare/Augment Code vs SRD CodeFree

Augment CodevsSRD CodeFree

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.3
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.5

“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”

SRD CodeFree
China Telecom Research Institute · IDE extension
#106MCP
Panel
6.1
0 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.7

“It ships prepackaged digital employees called /frontend-dev and /backend-dev, which is the org chart arriving as slash commands.”

Spec by spec

SpecAugment CodeSRD CodeFree
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYesApproval modes explicitly govern permission for file editing and shell command execution, with a whitelist for automatic execution.
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYesThe CodeReview skill works over pull and merge requests, a single commit or a commit range; the listing does not describe the agent committing on your behalf.
Browser controlNoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. No
Sandboxed executionYesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. No
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, KimiGLM-5.1, Qwen3.5, SrdCoder V5, SrdNES V4
Bring your own modelNoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. No
Local modelsNoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. No
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$20/mon/a
Free tierNoNo
Bring your own keyNoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. No
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub stars283n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAugment CodeSRD CodeFreePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.06.5Augment Code — Use Augment when the codebase is the problem; on a small repo you are paying a markup for an index you do not need, so pick Claude Code there.
El Crítico6.06.0no preference
El Profesor6.57.0SRD CodeFree — CodeAudit runs taint-tracking security analysis and code search is backed by a language server, so two of the inputs are deterministic analyses rather than the model's impression.
La Inversora7.06.8Augment Code — Publishing a 40 percent service fee is either transparency or a confession, and exposing the index over MCP is a hedge toward becoming a component in other people's agents.
La Jefa6.85.8Augment Code — SOC 2 Type II, CMEK, audit trails and training exclusion on every plan, pooled usage to 50 seats, SSO and SCIM at Enterprise; approved with a spend ceiling.
El Hacker4.34.5SRD CodeFree — Four vendor models, no key of mine, no model of mine, nothing running on my hardware. The one open door is an organisation MCP marketplace with publishing and install counts.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.