agentboards.org
Compare/Augment Code vs Zoo Code

Augment CodevsZoo Code

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Augment Code
Augment Code · IDE extension
#32MCP
Panel
6.3
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.0
Cost
5.2
Longevity
6.5

“Charges the model's list price plus a 40 percent service fee, which is at least a markup you can read without a lawyer.”

Zoo Code
Zoo Code Org · IDE extension
#16OSSMCP
Panel
7.5
7 spec wins
Reliability
7.0
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
8.5
Longevity
7.2

“The original team wound down the extension to focus on Roomote, so the fork is now the product and the product is now a memory.”

Spec by spec

SpecAugment CodeZoo Code
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocal, cloudlocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverYesNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlNoAuggie ships web-search and web-fetch tools only, so it can read pages but cannot drive a browser; browser automation requires adding a third-party MCP server. NoThe documented tool set covers read, edit, execute, image and workflow tools; no browser tool is listed.
Sandboxed executionYesCosmos cloud environments are built from a Docker base image you pick from any public registry and each session starts from a fresh isolated snapshot; the local Auggie CLI has no sandbox, and self-hosted daemons isolate only via per-session Git worktrees. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesThe Orchestrator delegates subtasks with parallel coordination, per-subtask provider profiles and parent/child task recovery.
Headless / CI modeYes`auggie --print` runs non-interactively for scripts and CI, and Augment publishes GitHub Actions wrappers for PR descriptions and reviews. No
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, KimiClaude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, Grok, MiniMax, Zoo Gateway, Ollama, LM Studio
Bring your own modelNoModel choice is limited to Augment's curated list via /model or --model; no custom base URL, LLM gateway, or Bedrock/Vertex/Azure deployment is documented. Yes
Local modelsNoNo local or OpenAI-compatible endpoint is documented; inference always runs through Augment. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$20/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoLLM usage is billed by Augment as provider cost plus a 40% service fee; supplying your own provider key or cloud account is not documented. Yes
Openness
Open sourceNoYes
LicenseproprietaryApache-2.0
GitHub stars2831,937

Which one would each critic pick

CriticAugment CodeZoo CodePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.07.8Zoo Code — Pick Zoo Code if you already know Roo Code's modes and want a version somebody is still maintaining; pick Cline if you would rather start from the tool with the largest crowd.
El Crítico6.07.0Zoo Code — Longer autonomous runs are permitted because a Destructive Command Guard blocks dangerous commands. That is a denylist, and a denylist is only as good as the last thing somebody thought of.
El Profesor6.57.0Zoo Code — Semble is described as codebase intelligence giving semantic search with no separate indexing step, which is a claim about when the work happens rather than about whether it happens.
La Inversora7.07.5Zoo Code — 1,793 stars in four months and a gateway selling pay-as-you-go credits with no subscription. That is a fork with a revenue line, which is rarer than the fork.
La Jefa6.87.5Zoo Code — Zero across sixty seats, and multi-root path controls plus per-mode server restrictions give me something to actually configure, which almost nothing free on this board does.
El Hacker4.38.5Zoo Code — Apache-2.0, my own keys at the provider's own rates, and Ollama and LM Studio are documented providers, so the whole loop runs on hardware I built if I want it to.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.