agentboards.org
Compare/Baz vs DeepSource

BazvsDeepSource

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Baz
Baz · Code review agent
#179
Panel
5.6
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.0
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
4.7
Longevity
5.8

“It reviews merge decisions too, so the argument you lose to a bot is now about whether to ship at all.”

DeepSource
DeepSource · Code review agent
#64MCP
Panel
6.1
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
5.0
Longevity
6.8

“It detects committed secrets, which is mostly a tool for finding out which of your colleagues commits secrets.”

Spec by spec

SpecBazDeepSource
Architecture
CategoryCode review agentCode review agent
Runscloudcloud
Platformswebweb
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoNo
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesYesAutofix commits corrections back to the pull request.
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesNo
Headless / CI modeYesYes
Models
BackboneAnthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini
Bring your own modelNoYesBYOK for AI Review, with inference on your own infrastructure, is an Enterprise-tier feature.
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedmixed
Starts at$30/mo$24/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoYes
Openness
Open sourceNoNo
Licenseproprietaryproprietary
GitHub starsn/an/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticBazDeepSourcePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.36.5DeepSource — Pick it if you want review, security scanning and coverage from one vendor; pick Codacy when the editor-side catch matters more than the automatic fix.
El Crítico5.86.0DeepSource — The automatic correction commits back to the pull request, so a wrong fix becomes a commit with your pipeline's approval and your author's name near it.
El Profesor5.86.5DeepSource — Deterministic analysers and model agents produce findings into the same comment stream with no published split between them, and no precision figure for either.
La Inversora6.37.5DeepSource — A $24 per-user subscription with review metered per processed line on top, and bring-your-own-inference held back for the enterprise tier, is a well-designed expansion ladder.
La Jefa5.86.3DeepSource — Sixty seats at $24 billed yearly is $1,440 a month, and the annual review credit of $100 covers roughly one week before the per-line meter starts.
El Hacker3.84.0DeepSource — Closed and hosted, except that running inference on my own infrastructure with my own keys exists and sits behind a sales conversation, which is my least favourite kind of open.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.