ccteamvsFleetCode
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
ccteam
firstintent · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.41 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.0
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 7.7
- Longevity
- 5.3
“It supports scheduled turns, so the agent can now wake at three in the morning and be wrong on a timer.”
FleetCode
built-by-as · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.42 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.2
- Usefulness
- 6.2
- Cost
- 8.2
- Longevity
- 5.2
“An Electron app whose entire job is to open terminals, which is the most modern thing to happen to the command line this year.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | ccteam | FleetCode |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | YesCode is changed by the vendor CLI ccteam spawns; ccteam supplies the routing, guardrails and delivery. | YesFile edits are made by the Claude Code or Codex session FleetCode spawns, not by FleetCode itself. |
| Git operations | No | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | YesMultiple agent sessions run in parallel in separate worktrees; they do not coordinate with each other. |
| Headless / CI mode | No | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Claude Code, Codex, Grok, Kimi, DeepSeek Harness, Pi | Claude Code, Codex |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | No | No |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| GitHub stars | 620 | 424 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | ccteam | FleetCode | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.8 | 7.3 | FleetCode — Pick it if parallel agents keep colliding in one checkout; pick a single branch and a terminal if you have never actually needed two at once. |
| El Crítico | 5.5 | 6.3 | FleetCode — The row records that the parallel sessions do not coordinate with each other, so multi-agent here means several agents unaware of each other rather than a team. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 6.5 | ccteam — Every delegation is recorded as a traceable parent-to-child edge on a live topology, which makes the provenance of a change a queryable structure rather than an inference. |
| La Inversora | 5.8 | 6.0 | FleetCode — 424 stars, one author, no company and no paid surface: a worktree manager for two vendors' CLIs, which is a feature those vendors will ship themselves. |
| La Jefa | 6.3 | 5.3 | ccteam — It keeps a running cost ledger, which is the first time this category has offered me a number before the invoice; Windows only through WSL is the price. |
| El Hacker | 7.3 | 7.3 | no preference |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.