agentboards.org
Compare/claude-code-router vs diri

claude-code-routervsdiri

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”

diri
cristicretu · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
6.9
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“It runs plain shells beside the agents, so a human and four robots can now miss the same deadline in parallel.”

Spec by spec

Specclaude-code-routerdiri
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. Yes
Multi-file editsNoYesEdits come from the agent running in the session; diri supplies the worktree, the status and the persistence.
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionYesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, BailianClaude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. No
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars37,511351

Which one would each critic pick

Criticclaude-code-routerdiriPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.36.8diri — Sessions run on remote hosts as well as locally, and nothing documented describes what a remote run does when the link drops mid-task.
El Profesor7.07.3diri — Session state lives in a daemon rather than in the user interface: closing the app does not end a run, and restarting the daemon restores the conversations.
La Inversora6.56.0claude-code-router — The entire product is an arbitrage on the gap between what agents charge and what tokens cost, which makes its lifespan a function of somebody else's pricing page.
La Jefa6.57.0diri — A signed and notarized universal build delivered through a self-updating Homebrew cask is the first distribution story on this shelf I could hand to sixty people unchanged.
El Hacker8.87.0claude-code-router — MIT, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint becomes a provider by writing its base URL into the config, which includes the server on my own machine.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.