agentboards.org
Compare/claude-code-router vs Hermes Agent

claude-code-routervsHermes Agent

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
1 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”

Hermes Agent
Nous Research · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
6 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.5
Cost
7.2
Longevity
7.2

“Reachable on Signal and by email, so you can now be left on read by an agent on six platforms.”

Spec by spec

Specclaude-code-routerHermes Agent
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. Yes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoYes
Sandboxed executionYesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, BailianNous Portal, OpenRouter, OpenAI, Anthropic, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, Ollama, vLLM, llama.cpp
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. Yes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$20/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITMIT
GitHub stars37,511250,643

Which one would each critic pick

Criticclaude-code-routerHermes AgentPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.0claude-code-router — Pick it if you like your agent and dislike its bill; pick OpenCode if you would rather run an agent that talks to many providers without a proxy in between.
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor7.06.8claude-code-router — The local console logs the resolved route, latency, token counts and a cost estimate per request, which turns routing from an assumption into a measurement.
La Inversora6.56.8Hermes Agent — Nous Research gives the agent away and sells the Portal: 300-plus models, search, images and a cloud browser under one subscription from $20 a month, with a free tier as the funnel.
La Jefa6.55.3claude-code-router — Free for sixty, and the credential pool with key rotation is the first thing on this board that looks like something a platform team would actually want.
El Hacker8.88.5claude-code-router — MIT, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint becomes a provider by writing its base URL into the config, which includes the server on my own machine.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.