agentboards.org
Compare/claude-code-router vs Maestro

claude-code-routervsMaestro

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”

Maestro
Maestro · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
5 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
7.3
Cost
7.5
Longevity
6.2

“There is a built-in web server with QR access, so you can now supervise a fleet of agents from a restaurant.”

Spec by spec

Specclaude-code-routerMaestro
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. Yes
Multi-file editsNoYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionYesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYesA maestro-cli binary runs playbooks headlessly from cron or CI with human-readable or JSONL output.
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, BailianClaude Code, OpenAI Codex, OpenCode, Factory Droid, Copilot CLI
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. No
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
GitHub stars37,5113,389

Which one would each critic pick

Criticclaude-code-routerMaestroPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.36.3no preference
El Profesor7.07.3Maestro — Sub-agents work in their own git worktrees on isolated branches, which makes parallelism a property of the filesystem rather than a promise about scheduling.
La Inversora6.56.5no preference
La Jefa6.56.5no preference
El Hacker8.88.0claude-code-router — MIT, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint becomes a provider by writing its base URL into the config, which includes the server on my own machine.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.