agentboards.org
Compare/claude-code-router vs Trinity

claude-code-routervsTrinity

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

claude-code-router
musistudio · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.0
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.3
Usefulness
7.7
Cost
8.3
Longevity
5.8

“Its main job is pointing Claude Code at a model that is not Claude, and it is named after both of them.”

Trinity
Ability AI · Agent harness
OSSMCP
Panel
7.2
5 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
7.8
Longevity
6.3

“Agents escalate their approvals to a human operator queue, which is a promotion nobody on the team applied for.”

Spec by spec

Specclaude-code-routerTrinity
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal, cloud, sandbox
Platformsmacos, linux, windows, webmacos, linux, web
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoYes
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsNoCCR is a routing proxy; the agent CLI behind it does the executing. Yes
Multi-file editsNoYesFiles are changed by the Claude Code or Gemini agent Trinity runs inside each container, not by Trinity itself.
Git operationsNoYesAgent workspaces and state are versioned in Git, credentials are stored encrypted in the repository, and agents can be created from a GitHub template.
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionYesA documented docker compose deployment runs the router itself in a container; it does not sandbox the agents that call it. Yes
Multi-agent orchestrationYesCCR fronts many agent CLIs at once (Claude Code, Codex, Grok CLI, Kimi CLI, Kilo Code, OpenCode, ZCode) but does not itself orchestrate agents against a task. Yes
Headless / CI modeNoYesAgents run unattended on cron schedules and can be started through the REST API or Trinity's MCP tools; there is no dedicated CI action.
Models
BackboneOpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, OpenRouter, DeepSeek, SiliconFlow, Moonshot Kimi, Mistral, Z.AI, BailianClaude Opus, Claude Sonnet, Claude Haiku, Gemini
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesAny OpenAI-compatible endpoint can be added as a custom provider with its own base URL, which covers a locally hosted server; no named Ollama or LM Studio preset is documented. No
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseMITApache-2.0
GitHub stars37,511605

Which one would each critic pick

Criticclaude-code-routerTrinityPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.37.3no preference
El Crítico6.36.8Trinity — Credentials are stored encrypted in the repository, which means secrets live in version history, and version history is the one place you cannot delete from.
El Profesor7.07.3Trinity — A tamper-evident audit trail paired with a human approval queue means an unattended run produces both a record and a place where it must stop.
La Inversora6.57.0Trinity — 506 stars, a named company, and a plugin marketplace attached to a free platform: the software is the distribution and the marketplace is the business.
La Jefa6.56.8Trinity — Cost tracking, fleet health monitoring and one container per agent, self-hosted: this is the first row this quarter where the operations story arrived finished.
El Hacker8.88.3claude-code-router — MIT, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint becomes a provider by writing its base URL into the config, which includes the server on my own machine.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.