Claude CodevsOpenCode
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Claude Code
Anthropic · Terminal agent
#3MCP
Panel
7.03 spec wins
- Reliability
- 7.2
- Usefulness
- 8.0
- Cost
- 5.5
- Longevity
- 7.2
“Included with Pro at $20, which is how you learn what the Max plan is for.”
OpenCode
Anomaly (formerly SST) · Terminal agent
#5OSSMCP
Panel
7.05 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.7
- Usefulness
- 7.3
- Cost
- 7.3
- Longevity
- 6.8
“Two hundred thousand GitHub stars, seventy-five providers, and a vendor that renamed itself before the tool did.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Claude Code | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Terminal agent | Terminal agent |
| Runs | local, cloud | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | 200k tokens, 1M on select models | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | Yes |
| Browser control | Yes | NoBuilt-in tools include webfetch and websearch only; nothing drives or reads a browser. |
| Sandboxed execution | Yes | NoTool calls are gated by the permission config, which is an approval policy rather than container or OS-level isolation. |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Yes | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | Yes | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | Claude | Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, Ollama |
| Bring your own model | YesThrough Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud's Agent Platform, Microsoft Foundry, or any LLM gateway your organisation runs, with model IDs pinned per deployment. | Yes |
| Local models | NoClaude Code routes only to Claude models. Anthropic states it does not support routing Claude Code to non-Claude models through any gateway, and gateway model discovery drops every model ID that does not contain "claude" or "anthropic", so a local Ollama or LM Studio endpoint is not a supported setup. | Yes |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | mixed | mixed |
| Starts at | $20/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Bring your own key | YesYour own Anthropic API key, or your own AWS, Google Cloud or Azure account. | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | Yes |
| License | proprietary | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 148,889 | 211,366 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Claude Code | OpenCode | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 7.8 | 8.0 | OpenCode — OpenCode is what to hand anyone who wants the Claude Code shape with their own keys and a model picker; pick Claude Code if you want one vendor and one bill. |
| El Crítico | 6.8 | 7.0 | OpenCode — Commands run with your permissions and no sandbox, and the Zen gateway offers free models without saying who pays for them. |
| El Profesor | 6.8 | 6.8 | no preference |
| La Inversora | 8.5 | 6.0 | Claude Code — Anthropic owns the model, the distribution and the invoice, which is the rarest kind of moat in this category. |
| La Jefa | 7.0 | 5.8 | Claude Code — Team seats at $20 with SSO, Enterprise for audit logs; the metered part is what sixty engineers on agentic tasks will actually cost. |
| El Hacker | 5.0 | 8.8 | OpenCode — MIT, Ollama for offline, MCP servers in opencode.json with a published $schema, custom agents, and it has already been forked, which is the point. |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.