agentboards.org
Compare/Claudine vs Symphony

ClaudinevsSymphony

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Claudine
Xemantic · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
4.7
4 spec wins
Reliability
3.8
Usefulness
4.2
Cost
6.7
Longevity
4.2

“The Windows native build is still in progress, which is also a fair status report for an agent that keeps rewriting itself.”

Symphony
OpenAI · Agent harness
OSS
Panel
4.8
3 spec wins
Reliability
4.7
Usefulness
4.8
Cost
5.5
Longevity
4.0

“The release binary is symphony-v0.0.1, so the version number doubles as the maintenance plan.”

Spec by spec

SpecClaudineSymphony
Architecture
CategoryAgent harnessAgent harness
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linuxmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesNo
Git operationsYesYes
Browser controlYesClaudine has internet access through its tools; the README does not describe browser automation. No
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationNoYes
Headless / CI modeNoYes
Models
BackboneAnthropicCodex (OpenAI)
Bring your own modelYesNo
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokfree
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesNo
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
GitHub stars17927,502

Which one would each critic pick

CriticClaudineSymphonyPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.54.8Claudine — Pick this if you want to understand how a harness works from the inside; pick a maintained terminal agent if you want to finish a ticket this afternoon.
El Crítico4.33.5Claudine — It is documented as able to rewrite its own prompts, modify its algorithmic logic and add its own tools, which makes every reproduction report a different program.
El Profesor4.85.5Symphony — WORKFLOW.md is YAML front matter over a Markdown prompt; a workspace per issue, max_concurrent_agents defaulting to 10 and max_turns to 20, restarts on stall, PRs with proof of work.
La Inversora4.84.5Claudine — Xemantic sells workshops and research, so the code is the syllabus rather than the asset, and a hundred and seventy-seven stars is the marketing return on it.
La Jefa3.54.3Symphony — Elixir and OTP through mise, Codex and git on the host, tracker credentials for Linear, GitHub Issues, Jira, Asana or GitLab, and nobody on call; not yet.
El Hacker5.56.0Symphony — Apache-2.0 Elixir, one codex.command key to swap the agent, hooks.after_create to prepare a workspace, no MCP, no local models, and a README that tells me to fork it.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.