agentboards.org
Compare/Cline vs DevoxxGenie

ClinevsDevoxxGenie

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Cline
Cline Bot Inc. · IDE extension
#11OSSMCP
Panel
6.8
4 spec wins
Reliability
6.8
Usefulness
7.2
Cost
6.3
Longevity
6.8

“Asks permission before every command, which is why your first move is finding the auto-approve list.”

DevoxxGenie
Devoxx · IDE extension
#21OSSMCP
Panel
7.7
0 spec wins
Reliability
7.2
Usefulness
7.5
Cost
8.8
Longevity
7.3

“It ships a kanban board backed by Backlog.md, so your agent can now be blocked on a ticket like everybody else.”

Spec by spec

SpecClineDevoxxGenie
Architecture
CategoryIDE extensionIDE extension
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYesAgent Mode ships a run_command tool alongside its file and search tools.
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsYesNo
Browser controlYesBrowser control lives in the IDE extension, which drives Chrome over the DevTools protocol with puppeteer-core; the CLI's ClineCore tool set only has fetch_web. No
Sandboxed executionNoThe CLI's CLINE_SANDBOX mode only redirects session, database and provider state to a separate data directory; there is no container, VM or OS-level isolation in the repository. No
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYesAgent Mode runs parallel sub-agents, and ACP and CLI runners let it drive Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Kimi and Copilot as external agents.
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneAnthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, Cline provider, Ollama, LM StudioOllama, LMStudio, GPT4All, Llama.cpp, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Mistral, Groq, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, OpenRouter, Azure OpenAI, Amazon Bedrock
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsYesYes
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars69,688683

Which one would each critic pick

CriticClineDevoxxGeniePick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo7.58.0DevoxxGenie — Pick DevoxxGenie if you live in IntelliJ and want an agent that edits code for free; pick Firebender if you would rather pay someone to answer the phone when it breaks.
El Crítico6.57.0DevoxxGenie — The run_command tool executes on your machine inside the IDE process, with no isolation layer described between a generated command and your shell.
El Profesor6.38.0DevoxxGenie — Gitleaks, OpenGrep and Trivy are wired in as agent tools and their findings become prioritised backlog tasks, which grounds the work queue in analysers rather than in the model's opinion.
La Inversora5.87.3DevoxxGenie — The publisher is a conference organisation, not a company, and it has shipped since April 2024 with 679 stars. Nobody here needs an exit, which is the point.
La Jefa5.87.3DevoxxGenie — Zero across sixty seats and installed from a marketplace my desktop policy already permits, with no console, no directory sync and no audit trail behind it.
El Hacker9.08.8Cline — Apache-2.0, every prompt readable, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint including my local box, MCP from a JSON file; this is what ownership looks like.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.