CLIOvsOpenDev
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
CLIO
Synthetic Autonomic Mind · Terminal agent
#81OSSMCP
Panel
6.63 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.5
- Usefulness
- 6.5
- Cost
- 8.5
- Longevity
- 4.8
“Sub-agent output goes to tmux, GNU Screen or Zellij panes, so the multiplexer argument now has actual stakes.”
OpenDev
OpenDev · Terminal agent
#97OSSMCP
Panel
6.61 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.2
- Usefulness
- 6.2
- Cost
- 8.2
- Longevity
- 5.8
“It publishes a technical report on arXiv, which is an unusual amount of paperwork for something you install with a package manager.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | CLIO | OpenDev |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Terminal agent | Terminal agent |
| Runs | local | local |
| Platforms | macos, linux | macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | No | No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | Yes | No |
| Browser control | YesA web capability fetches and analyses web content; there is no driven browser. | No |
| Sandboxed execution | YesA clio-container mode provides OS-level isolation via Docker; CLIO itself also runs from a published container image. | No |
| Multi-agent orchestration | YesSub-agents run in parallel with file locks, git locks and rate limiting, with live output panes in tmux, GNU Screen or Zellij. | YesParallel agents are the headline feature, each one bound to the LLM you pick for it. |
| Headless / CI mode | No | No |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | GitHub Copilot, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, Z.AI, NVIDIA NIM, llama.cpp, LM Studio | Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Mistral, Qwen, OpenRouter, Ollama, LM Studio |
| Bring your own model | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | Yes | Yes |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | byok | byok |
| Starts at | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | Yes | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 843 |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | CLIO | OpenDev | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 7.0 | 7.0 | no preference |
| El Crítico | 6.0 | 6.3 | OpenDev — It spawns parallel agents into one project, records no git operations and describes no isolation, so concurrent writes are a question the row does not answer. |
| El Profesor | 7.3 | 6.5 | CLIO — Approval sits between the plan and the edits, and any turn can be undone, so the loop has both a gate before it and a reverse after it. |
| La Inversora | 5.8 | 6.5 | OpenDev — 832 stars, no company, no price and no hosted surface: a well-executed tool occupying a position that generates goodwill and nothing else. |
| La Jefa | 5.5 | 5.3 | CLIO — It runs tasks on remote systems over SSH with no SSO, no audit log and no retention policy, which is the sentence my security review will stop on. |
| El Hacker | 8.0 | 8.0 | no preference |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.