Codacyvscubic
Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.
Codacy
Codacy · Code review agent
#127MCP
Panel
6.21 spec wins
- Reliability
- 6.2
- Usefulness
- 6.3
- Cost
- 5.7
- Longevity
- 6.7
“It covers 49 languages, which is 48 more than the one your monorepo is actually written in.”
cubic
cubic · Code review agent
#88MCP
Panel
6.03 spec wins
- Reliability
- 5.8
- Usefulness
- 6.8
- Cost
- 5.5
- Longevity
- 6.0
“The free tier is twenty pull request reviews a month, which is either a whole team or one Dependabot.”
Spec by spec
| Spec | Codacy | cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Category | Code review agent | Code review agent |
| Runs | cloud, local | cloud, sandbox |
| Platforms | macos, linux, windows, web | web, macos, linux, windows |
| Context window | not documented | not documented |
| Protocols | ||
| MCP client | No | No |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities | ||
| Runs terminal commands | No | No |
| Multi-file edits | Yes | Yes |
| Git operations | YesThrough merge gates and merge policies on pull requests rather than by committing code itself. | Yes |
| Browser control | No | No |
| Sandboxed execution | No | Yes |
| Multi-agent orchestration | No | Yes |
| Headless / CI mode | Yes | Yes |
| Models | ||
| Backbone | undisclosed | OpenAI, Anthropic, Claude Code |
| Bring your own model | No | No |
| Local models | No | No |
| Cost | ||
| Pricing model | seat | seat |
| Starts at | $18/mo | $30/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Bring your own key | No | Yes |
| Openness | ||
| Open source | No | No |
| License | proprietary | proprietary |
| GitHub stars | n/a | n/a |
Which one would each critic pick
| Critic | Codacy | cubic | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| El Juez | — | — | not enough reviews |
| El Amigo | 6.8 | 7.0 | cubic — Pick cubic if you are on GitHub and want a reviewer whose CLI also runs on uncommitted changes from inside Cursor, Claude Code or Codex; pick Bito if you are on GitLab or Bitbucket. |
| El Crítico | 6.3 | 6.5 | cubic — Background agents give the GitHub App write access so the reviewer can commit fixes; the docs limit that scope to fix branches and promise never to push to main. |
| El Profesor | 6.3 | 6.5 | cubic — The benchmark claim is well specified and third-party: Martian's Code Review Bench, F1 61.8%, precision 56.3%, recall 68.6%, self-reported by cubic on 25 March 2026. |
| La Inversora | 7.0 | 6.3 | Codacy — Team is $18 per developer a month billed yearly and free for open source, which is a static-analysis business buying its way into the review category. |
| La Jefa | 7.0 | 6.0 | Codacy — Sixty developers at $21 monthly is $1,260 a month, the free editor plugin costs nothing, and everything security asks about lives in a tier priced by conversation. |
| El Hacker | 4.0 | 4.0 | no preference |
Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.