agentboards.org
Compare/CodeAlta vs kimchi

CodeAltavskimchi

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

CodeAlta
Alexandre Mutel · Terminal agent
#114OSSMCP
Panel
6.3
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
7.5
Longevity
5.7

“Attach files with an at sign and GitHub issues with a hash, so your prompt now has the same syntax as a social media post.”

kimchi
kimchi · Terminal agent
#75OSSMCP
Panel
6.2
3 spec wins
Reliability
6.2
Usefulness
6.8
Cost
5.8
Longevity
5.8

“It divides work between an orchestrator, a builder and an explorer, which is more organisational structure than some of its users have.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodeAltakimchi
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesHost tools execute the agent's tool calls, and an in-session "alta" live tool automates local workflows. Yes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoYes
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesDelegated work and plugin orchestration adapters run through the same session runtime; different sessions execute concurrently. YesMulti-model mode assigns separate models to orchestrator, builder and explorer roles and delegates tasks between them.
Headless / CI modeNoYesThe repository ships a Terminal-Bench adapter that aggregates usage across session files, which implies unattended runs.
Models
BackboneCodex, GitHub Copilot, xAI Grok, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Alibaba, Anthropic, Gemini, Vertexkimchi-dev models, Anthropic
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelbyokusage
Starts at$0/mon/a
Free tierYesNo
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseApache-2.0
GitHub stars2272,231

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodeAltakimchiPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.06.5kimchi — Pick it if you want role-splitting without wiring it yourself; pick a single-model agent if you would rather not debug three models at once.
El Crítico5.56.0kimchi — In multi-model mode an orchestrator delegates to role-specific models, so a bad result has three possible authors and nothing documented attributes it.
El Profesor7.06.5CodeAlta — A session actor per conversation serialises prompts, compacts long histories and journals every step, which places conversation state in the runtime rather than the provider.
La Inversora5.86.0kimchi — 2,220 stars, a permissive CLI and an API key in the middle: the code is the marketing and the inference is the company.
La Jefa6.05.0CodeAlta — Zero licence cost, and it installs as a global tool through the package manager my Windows fleet already runs, against Copilot and Codex subscriptions finance already pays.
El Hacker7.57.0CodeAlta — BSD-2-Clause, MCP servers wired from a documented config, plus local plugins and skill folders that follow the Agent Skills layout so my existing ones drop straight in.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.