agentboards.org
Compare/CodeAlta vs MothX

CodeAltavsMothX

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

CodeAlta
Alexandre Mutel · Terminal agent
#114OSSMCP
Panel
6.3
0 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.2
Cost
7.5
Longevity
5.7

“Attach files with an at sign and GitHub issues with a hash, so your prompt now has the same syntax as a social media post.”

MothX
startvibecoding · Terminal agent
#130OSSMCP
Panel
6.3
1 spec wins
Reliability
5.8
Usefulness
6.3
Cost
7.8
Longevity
5.2

“It publishes FreeBSD binaries, a thoroughness the rest of this industry abandoned somewhere around the second funding round.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodeAltaMothX
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux, windows
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesYes
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesHost tools execute the agent's tool calls, and an in-session "alta" live tool automates local workflows. Yes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNoIsolation uses bwrap process sandboxing rather than a container; a Docker image is offered only as a way to run MothX itself.
Multi-agent orchestrationYesDelegated work and plugin orchestration adapters run through the same session runtime; different sessions execute concurrently. Yes--multi-agent runs asynchronous sub-agents, --delegate blocks on a delegated subtask, and an A2A master mode coordinates across systems.
Headless / CI modeNoNo
Models
BackboneCodex, GitHub Copilot, xAI Grok, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Alibaba, Anthropic, Gemini, VertexDeepSeek, OpenAI, Anthropic, Volcengine, LongCat, Mistral, GitHub Copilot, Cloudflare, Amazon Bedrock
Bring your own modelYesYes
Local modelsNoYes
Cost
Pricing modelbyokbyok
Starts at$0/mo$0/mo
Free tierYesYes
Bring your own keyYesYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseMIT
GitHub stars227n/a

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodeAltaMothXPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo6.06.5MothX — Pick this if you want a terminal agent that also lives inside the editor you already use; pick a purpose-built extension if the terminal was never where you wanted to be.
El Crítico5.55.8MothX — One of the three modes grants full system access by name, and the command safety underneath it is a blacklist, which is the weaker half of that design choice.
El Profesor7.06.3CodeAlta — A session actor per conversation serialises prompts, compacts long histories and journals every step, which places conversation state in the runtime rather than the provider.
La Inversora5.86.0MothX — Published under a Chinese hosting foundation's namespace with a mirror abroad, first released in May 2026, and already carrying a skills marketplace, which is where a business would start.
La Jefa6.05.3CodeAlta — Zero licence cost, and it installs as a global tool through the package manager my Windows fleet already runs, against Copilot and Codex subscriptions finance already pays.
El Hacker7.58.0MothX — MIT, twenty-plus vendor adapters with DeepSeek as the default, local weights supported and MCP servers attaching, all from a single Go binary with no external dependencies.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.