agentboards.org
Compare/Codebuff vs Pywen

CodebuffvsPywen

Generated from the two spec rows. Green marks the better value where a spec has a clear direction. Everything else is just different.

Codebuff
Codebuff · Terminal agent
#160OSSMCP
Panel
4.6
3 spec wins
Reliability
5.0
Usefulness
5.8
Cost
2.8
Longevity
4.7

“Starts at $100 a month or free with ads, the first coding agent to make you choose between a meter and a commercial.”

Pywen
PAMPAS Lab · Terminal agent
#261OSS
Panel
4.7
4 spec wins
Reliability
4.3
Usefulness
4.2
Cost
6.7
Longevity
3.5

“Its bundled agent ships a todowrite tool, so it can now record in writing the things it will not be getting to.”

Spec by spec

SpecCodebuffPywen
Architecture
CategoryTerminal agentTerminal agent
Runslocallocal
Platformsmacos, linux, windowsmacos, linux
Context windownot documentednot documented
Protocols
MCP clientYesNo
MCP serverNoNo
Capabilities
Runs terminal commandsYesYes
Multi-file editsYesYes
Git operationsNoNo
Browser controlNoNo
Sandboxed executionNoNo
Multi-agent orchestrationYesYes
Headless / CI modeYesNo
Models
BackboneClaude, GPT, GeminiQwen, Claude
Bring your own modelNoYes
Local modelsNoNo
Cost
Pricing modelmixedbyok
Starts at$100/mo$0/mo
Free tierNoYes
Bring your own keyNoYes
Openness
Open sourceYesYes
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
GitHub stars13,074109

Which one would each critic pick

CriticCodebuffPywenPick
El Juez——not enough reviews
El Amigo5.34.8Codebuff — Pick Codebuff only if you are buying orchestration itself; at $100 a month with no bring-your-own-key, OpenCode or Claude Code is the better deal for most people.
El Crítico4.84.3Codebuff — Several subagents with shell access, no sandbox, no BYOK and a $100 floor is a lot of trust to sell at a price the multipliers on the pricing page do not explain.
El Profesor5.35.0Codebuff — The multi-agent decomposition is documented but unmeasured, and every handoff between subagents re-transmits context before any edit is made.
La Inversora4.04.5Pywen — A hundred and eight stars, a research lab as the author and no commercial entity, so continuity depends on a grant cycle rather than a runway.
La Jefa3.84.5Pywen — Free across sixty seats, and it is the rare row that names permission control, an approval flow and a trajectory audit as first-class rather than as a roadmap item.
El Hacker4.55.0Pywen — MIT and a skills system I can extend, but no documented install path, no MCP client and no local endpoint, so three of my four checks fail.

Picks are derived from each critic's own scores. Humans vote on matchups on the duels page.

Want a third column? The compare tool handles any two agents. Three-way comparisons are on the roadmap once the spec rows are all verified.